Lawfare keeps its readers updated on the latest scholarship across a wide range of relevant areas and disciplines. Law review articles, working papers, casebook supplements, and other noteworthy new works are all linked to here.
Latest in Scholarship
The Harvard National Security Journal’s spring issue, published last week, has five articles that may be of interest to Lawfare readers.
Josh Blackman's thoughts on the meaning of judicial resistance in the Trump administration.
The Harvard National Security Journal’s fall issue, published earlier this week, has five articles that may be of interest to Lawfare readers.
On behalf of the University of Texas-Austin’s Strauss Center for International Security and Law, the AALS Section on National Security Law, and Ohio Northern University’s Pettit College of Law, I am pleased to announce that Rebecca Ingber of BU and Shirin Sinnar of Stanford are co-winners of the new Mike Lewis P
A new Supplement for Curtis A. Bradley and Jack Goldsmith, Foreign Relations Law: Cases and Materials (6th ed. 2017).
I am very pleased to share this news: An annual prize for outstanding national security law scholarship has been established in the name of our colleague Mike Lewis, who passed away in 2015.
The Intelligence Studies Project of the University of Texas at Austin announces the third annual competition recognizing outstanding student research and writing on topics related to intelligence and national security. The winner of the “Inman Award” will receive a cash prize of $5000, with two semifinalists each receiving a cash prize of $2500. This competition is open to unpublished work by undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in degree programs at accredited U.S.
The Intelligence Studies Project of the University of Texas at Austin announces the second round of an annual competition recognizing outstanding student research and writing on topics related to intelligence and national security.
The Harvard National Security Journal's fall issue, published earlier this week, may be of interest to Lawfare readers.
Ashley Deeks of UVa Law School (and Lawfare) argues that intelligence agencies restrain how foreign peer agencies conduct their work and view their legal obligations. These constraints, she maintains, are likely to grow in the future and might complement traditional public oversight and increase rights protections.