One of the great benefits of democracy is that politics impacts policy, even national security policy. Elections, confirmation battles, and legislative fights all affect the way the United States balances its competing priorities, interests and values as it conducts foreign and security affairs. National security professionals would therefore be wise to keep an eye on what candidates are saying about national security matters, how they are faring in the polls, and on which way the winds in Congress seem to be blowing the national security issues of the day.
Latest in Politics & National Security
We’ve collected all national security-related exchanges from both nights of the second Democratic primary debate of the 2020 campaign.
Our latest data on which institutions the public trusts and mistrusts to protect the country’s security.
We’re asking every presidential candidate this cycle to pledge, if he or she becomes president, to strive for gender parity in senior national security and foreign policy appointments.
Our latest data on which institutions the public trusts and mistrusts to protect the country’s security.
The first column in a new series on security issues facing Canada.
There are legitimate reasons to conduct a review of policies and procedures governing national security investigations involving political campaigns. But comments by the president and the attorney general only undermine that work.
With President Trump poised to toughen immigration policies, Americans are particularly concerned about family separation—but nearly half of Republicans find the separation policy “acceptable.”
Republicans appear to have reversed their opinions of Mueller and the investigation, but the public believes additional investigation is needed or remains unsure of whether it is.
There is a tendency to think of impeachable offenses as like landmines: If the president steps on one, then it explodes and he suffers the consequences. This is the wrong way to think about impeachments.
Things might get ugly.