Latest in Military Commissions
Last week, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri continued to discuss the absence of defense team members and pre-admitted more evidence.
Last week, the military commission in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. held three days of open session to discuss the status of procedural and discovery motions.
Background on the Dalmazzi case, an overview of its key issues, and highlights from Tuesday’s Supreme Court oral argument.
The military commission in the 9/11 case hears argument regarding the defense’s motion to dismiss charges against two defendants for lack of jurisdiction.
The military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri receives testimony from a witness on the ethics of the defense team’s withdrawal.
The charge sheet in United States v. Encep Nurjaman, Mohammed Nazir bin Lep, and Mohammed Farik bin Amin.
The prosecution wraps up the introduction of physical evidence from the site of the USS Cole bombing as the military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri continue.
The military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri have again resulted in collateral legal activity. This time, it could cost the U.S. government millions.
By holding Brig. Gen. John Baker in contempt on Nov. 1, Col. Vance Spath may have exceeded the powers granted in the Military Commissions Act of 2009.
As discussed in the last post in this series, on Wednesday, military judge Col. Vance Spath held Marine Corps Brig. Gen. John Baker, chief defense counsel of the military commissions, in contempt of court.