Latest in Interrogation: Criminal: Miranda

Interrogation: Abuses

Senator Feinstein's Remarks on the CIA-SSCI Document Controversy

Right now, Senator Dianne Feinstein, the Senate Intelligence Committee's Chairman, is speaking out, on the Senate floor, about a well-publicized dispute between the CIA and the SSCI---regarding the latter's review of documents pertaining to the CIA's interrogation practices in the years following 9/11, and the CIA's auditing of Committee staffers' computer use during the review.

Both matters---the Committee's retrieval of certain documents from an offsite location, and the CIA's actions during the Commi

Interrogation: Criminal

Should Abu Ghaith Have Been Sent to GTMO? Senators Ayotte and Graham (Still) Think So

Wednesday on the Senate floor, three senators spoke about the Obama administration's decision to prosecute, in a federal court, Osama bin Laden's son-in-law and Al Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith. Republican Senators Kelly Ayotte and Lindsey Graham unsurprisingly opposed this approach, and argued instead that Abu Ghaith should have been sent to GTMO for interrogation, detention, and (potentially) trial by military commission.

Interrogation: Criminal

Why No Period of Detention and Interrogation for Abu Ghaith, ala the Warsame Model?

As Ritika notes below, the United States has captured a senior al Qaeda figure (Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, who was the son-in-law of Osama bin Laden), and will be bringing him to the United States for prosecution in civilian court.  One important question this story raises is whether it is right to think of this as a continuation of the "Warsame model," or if instead this reflects a policy decision to steer even furth

Detention: Non-Guantanamo Habeas Litigation

False Continuity Continued: Today's WaPo on "Renditions" Under the Obama Administration

Under the snazzy headline "Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns," today's Washington Post has a long article on the overseas arrest, detention, and subsequent criminal indictment in New York (civilian) federal court of three "European men with Somali roots." The article claims (with emphasis added) that:

The men are the latest example of how the Obama admi

Interrogation

Al Shabaab Commander Turned Cooperating Witness?

An important story from Ben Weiser at the New York Times, from this morning, describes an interesting new development in the prosecution of Mohamed Ibrahim Ahmed--a case that receives little attention, but is in fact quite important.  Ahmed is an Eritrean citizen and Swedish resident, arrested in Nigeria in 2009 on suspicion of involvement in terrorism.  He was interrogated there by the Nigerian authorities first, then by a team of U.S.

Terrorism Trials & Investigations

Opinion Denying Motion to Suppress Post-Capture Statements in NYC Subway Plot Case

As I noted on Tuesday, Adis Medunjanin was convicted this week in connection with the NYC subway bombing plot.  Previously, he had moved to suppress inculpatory statements he’d made after his arrest, and the judge has now issued an opinion explaining the denial of the motion.  Given the importance of the issue (post-capture questioning in a terrorism-related case), the decision is worth reading in full.  For those who do not have time, the short version is that the court rejected three distinct arguments: that the government violated Edwards by questioning the defendant without counse

Terrorism Trials: Civilian Court

David Kris on Criminal Prosecution as a Counterterrorism Tool

Well, this is timely.  The Journal of National Security Law & Policy has just published this 104-page article from David Kris (who recently stepped down as the AAG for the National Security Division at DOJ) titled “Criminal Prosecution as a Counterterrorism Tool”.  Here’s an excerpt from the introduction:

This article argues that we should continue to use all of the military, law enforcement, intelligence, diplomatic, and economic tools at our disposal, selecting in each case the particular to

Subscribe to Lawfare

EmailRSSKindle