Latest in International Law: Self-Defense
On Wednesday, the North Atlantic Council released the following communique on behalf of the heads of state of NATO member-countries. The full document is below.
Did the IDF respond appropriately under international law to Palestinian demonstrators along the Gaza border?
Israel has officially acknowledged a September 2007 strike that destroyed the Al-Kibar nuclear reactor in Syria. The operation is a data point on state practice on preemptive self-defense against nuclear threats.
An analysis of the role that the “accumulation of events” doctrine may play in the debate over the legality of a possible “bloody nose” strike on North Korea.
After Prime Minister Theresa May referred to “unlawful use of force” in her speech concerning the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, it is worth clarifying the possible role of NATO and the range of potential British actions.
In her speech on the poisoning of Sergei Skripal, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May was deliberate with words and action. These diplomatic signals should have been clear to allies, especially the United States.
What an expansive conception of soldier or unit self-defense means for IHL and modern asymmetric conflict.
We provide an up-to-date list of the States that have expressed support for the “unwilling or unable” test (explicitly or implicitly), with the aim of making as much information as possible available in one place.
More detail on why I think Obama embraced and applied more frequently the Bush preemption doctrine.
A response to Daniel Bethlehem on Obama’s embrace of the Bush preemption principle.