Since the first detainees arrived in 2002, the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay has become nearly synonymous with the moral and legal quandaries posed by the “war on terror.” The camp’s location—on the island of Cuba, outside U.S. territory but de facto under total U.S. control—creates ambiguous legal obligations. And after the Bush administration began using the Guantanamo naval base as a place to hold detainees in the “war on terror,” questions soon arose over the use of torture and military commissions, along with the legality of military detention itself.  Though President Barack Obama pledged to close the detention center, Guantanamo has proved a difficult knot to unravel: the Obama administration continues to transfer remaining detainee away from the base, but debate continues over when and how Guantanamo will finally be closed. ​

Latest in Guantanamo


“No Ordinary Pakistani”: The Intertwined Stories of Saifullah and Uzair Paracha

As Guantanamo inches toward closure, the story of Saifullah Paracha and his son Uzair tells us much about the contradictions of U.S. policy during the global war on terror. Their intertwined stories undercut the notion that Guantanamo was or ever could be a legal system separate and apart from the federal courts.

Subscribe to Lawfare