A response to Philip Bobbitt’s counterargument.
Latest in Executive Power
Tribe has proposed a novel argument to assert that a sitting U.S. president can be indicted.
The Monroe Doctrine is a momentous example of the president’s vast constitutional power to set and communicate U.S. foreign policy—to include threatening war.
Wednesday’s vote was a major victory for opponents of the Yemen war. The reason has less to do with the legislation and more to do with the vote itself.
The Military Times reported on Nov. 21 that a White House memorandum had authorized the use of force by troops stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border. Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen and Chief of Staff John Kelly reportedly raised concerns over the constitutionality of the authorization, Politico writes.
The president shouldn’t hold his breath for the court to have any serious objections to the special counsel’s appointment.
On Monday, the Congressional Research Service published the following report on the 25th Amendment and the many controversies around its treatment of presidential disability.
Nov. 4 is the anniversary of, by some measures, the U.S. military’s worst battlefield defeat ever—an incident that says a great deal about executive and legislative use of military power in the early republic.
Courts should put the burden on prosecutors to prove that the president did not influence their charging decision—or grant defendants a limited discovery to seek evidence to the contrary.
Just as presidents respond in various ways to norms, so, too, do they react to changes in the legal structure with direct political and governing implications.