Latest in Detention: Operations in Afghanistan

Detention: Operations in Afghanistan

Bagram: More on Wind-down of Obama's Guantanamo

Bobby drew attention to yesterday's Washington Post article about the Afghan Government's release of hundreds of detainees the U.S. military had transferred to Afghan control at the detention facility at Bagram.  Bobby rightly commented that the Afghans' reluctance to hold detainees under the laws of war is not new; despite being in the middle of an armed conflict, they have resisted law-of-war detention for many years.

Detention & Guantanamo

Afghanistan May Release Hundreds of Detainees Transferred from US Military Custody

The unwinding of US detention operations in Afghanistan continues.   The latest development concerns the population of some 880 Afghan detainees whom the United States has transferred to Afghan control as part of the drawdown process (the United States continue to hold a smaller population of non-Afghan detainees, the long-term disposition plan for which is unclear to say the least).

Detention: Operations in Afghanistan

On the Legal Consequences of Moving Away from the Armed-Conflict Model of Counterterrorism

When it comes to detention and drone strikes, both critics and supporters of the status quo assume that abandoning the armed-conflict model would have not just diplomatic and legal effects but also a significant legal effect.  Critics bank on it, supporters fear it.  But what if their common assumption is wrong?  It's a question I address in a short piece this morning at Security States (a joint online project of Lawfare and The New Republic), titled "

Detention: Operations in Afghanistan

Oral Argument Preview: The Bagram Habeas Petitions

The question before a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit Tuesday morning: can a group of detainees held by the United States at Bagram airfield, in Afghanistan, challenge their detentions by petitioning for writs of habeas corpus?   It is presented in three cases, Al Maqaleh, Amanatullah, and Hamidullah, all of which were dismissed by District Court judges in 2012 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Terrorism Trials & Investigations

Postwar: An Essay on Whether the Armed-Conflict Model Still Matters

"Does it really matter, from a legal perspective, whether the U.S. government continues to maintain that it is in an armed conflict with al Qaeda?  When it comes to the use of lethal force and military detention, not nearly so much as both supporters and critics of the status quo commonly assume."

Detention: Operations in Afghanistan

The Lingering Problem of the Lingering Detainee Population Under US Control in Afghanistan

An article in the Washington Post today draws attention, once more (see here, for example), to the lingering question of what will become of the lingering population of detainees (all non-Afghans) remaining in US custody in Afghanistan.  Nothing new to report so far as I can tell, alas, other than the rather interesting fact that General Dunford has

Executive Power

White House Threatens Veto of NDAA

OMB has issued a Statement of Administration Policy (SAP) pointing out White House objections to various elements in pending NDAA legislation (H.R. 1960, the HASC NDAA FY'14 bill), and threatening to veto the legislation if changes are not made.  There are, of course, many different points of contention.  I'll highlight two sections of the SAP that may particularly interest Lawfare readers:

Detention: Law of

Eight Thoughts on the Broad Reading of Article II Inherent in Bobby’s Conjecture

Bobby’s post from Friday argued that “the current shadow war approach to counterterrorism doesn’t really require an armed-conflict predicate–or an AUMF, for that matter.”  Bobby’s point is that most if not all of the USG’s current uses of force outside Afghanistan could in theory continue even if the armed conflict against al Qaeda ended.  This is because, as Bobby says, the administration’s “imminent threat” constraint outside hot battlefields – which has allowed quite a lot of lethal force to be used in many nations – “is at

Subscribe to Lawfare