Latest in Cross-Border Data
EU policymakers may soon finalize cybersecurity standards that could render the new Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework irrelevant.
Biden’s recent executive order may transform how privacy complaints are resolved within the context of U.S. intelligence activities abroad by providing access to an adjudicative system globally.
For the first time, major world democracies have gone public with a set of common protections that they apply when accessing individuals’ personal data for intelligence or law enforcement purposes.
Following the Supreme Court’s abortion ruling in Dobbs this past June, cross-border data requests between states for abortion-related investigations may start to resemble cross-border requests between countries and trigger new conflicts of law.
A legislative deadlock in Brussels risks the future of U.S.-EU negotiations.
What commitments has the United States made in the recent Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework? And will those reforms be enough to pass muster when this next agreement goes before the Court of Justice for the European Union?
Nascent OECD work to identify principles on government access to data for law enforcement and national security purposes can have important normative significance but also faces political hurdles.
On Aug. 25, the U.K. Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) released important details about its post-Brexit strategy for cross-border flows of personal data. What's in the release?
CFIUS forced a Chinese firm to sell Grindr in 2019. Yet the application is sharing data widely today, including to a company in China.
Policymakers have paid scant consideration to the national security implications of unfettered, largely unregulated data brokering. That may be changing.