How do we protect the valuable national asset of artificial intelligence against a range of threats from hostile foreign actors, and how do we protect ourselves against the threat from AI in the hands of adversaries?
Latest in Artificial Intelligence
A review of Paul Scharre’s “Army of None: Autonomous Weapons and the Future of War” (W.W. Norton, 2018).
China’s evolving approach to lethal autonomous weapons systems takes the global stage at the U.N.’s Governmental Group of Experts.
In the context of both criminal justice and military operations, predictive algorithms are likely to be used for a similar purpose: making individual predictions about dangerousness and anticipating the location of future acts of violence.
The artificial intelligence revolution challenges law, policy, and governance at domestic and international levels. Compared to China, the U.S. may not be ready.
Through shrouded in premature concern, AI's disruptive potential merits serious operational and ethical considerations.
The Dual-Use Dilemma in China’s New AI Plan: Leveraging Foreign Innovation Resources and Military-Civil Fusion
On July 20, China’s State Council issued the “New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan” (新一代人工智能发展规划), which articulates an ambitious, three-step agenda for China to lead the world in AI.
It is clear that algorithmic warfare is developing now. Governments, industry, academia, and civil society should all be pursuing ways to secure war-algorithm accountability.
CFIUS represents but one helpful step to reduce damaging technology transfers. By itself, it will not adequately address the critical strategic challenge presented by China's advances in artificial intelligence.
What the definitive defeat of China’s best human Go players by foreign AI might mean for future intelligentized warfare.