When the government argues Trump v. Hawaii before the Supreme Court on April 25, it will rely on the president’s Article II power. What are that argument’s merits?
Latest in travel ban
An analysis of the Fourth Circuit's decision in IRAP v. Trump.
A look at the menu.
Analysis of IRAP v. Trump Part I: The Fourth Circuit’s Reliance on Pre- and Post-Inauguration Statements
An analysis of the majority opinion.
During oral arguments in the Fourth and Ninth Circuits, judges attempted to draw analogies between President Trump's travel ban and Korematsu v. United States (1944). The comparison supports the government’s argument.
Yesterday's argument in IRAP v. Trump offers a preview of the sorts of arguments that a majority of the Justices will likely find far more compelling than the majority of the Fourth Circuit.
An en banc Fourth Circuit hears argument on Executive Order 13,780.