After a long break, the military commission for accused al-Qaeda commander Abd al-Hadi al-Iraqi reconvened to debate motions relating to defense resources and treatment of the accused.
Latest in Military Commissions
Last Week at the Military Commissions: Administrative Matters and Defense Claims of Unjustified Interference
Last week, the military commission in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. held three days of open session to discuss the status of procedural and discovery motions.
A summary of the substantive issues addressed in this week’s hearings in the case of the 9/11 accused.
The collapse of the al-Nashiri trial defense team is only the latest setback for the dysfunctional military commission system.
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Brig. Gen. Mark Martins released a statement on October 14.
Pre-sentencing developments in United States v. Ahmed Mohammed Ahmed Haza al-Darbi.
This Week at the Military Commissions, Special Majid Khan Edition: “The Whole Enhanced Interrogation Thing”
We’re here today featuring a blast from the past. Remember Majid Shoukat Khan, the low-level Al Qaeda operative who pled guilty to all charges filed against him in 2012?
Brigadier General John G. Baker, Chief Defense Counsel of the Military Commissions Defense Organization, gave the following remarks yesterday at Georgetown University's NATSECDEF conference.
And we’re back, after a trifling 18-month delay, a lot of litigation, and a major D.C. Circuit decision: the military commission has reconvened for three days of motions hearings in the case of Abd al Rahim al Nashiri, accused of orchestrating the USS Cole bombing.
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins issued the following statement on Tuesday, September 6th on the occasion of the upcoming 15th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks and 16th anniversary of the bombing of the USS Cole.