Justice Against State Sponsors of Terrorism ACT (JASTA)

Latest in Justice Against State Sponsors of Terrorism ACT (JASTA)

Anti-Terrorism Act

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Vacates and Remands District Court Ruling in Linde v. Arab Bank

On February 9, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down a decision in Linde v. Arab Bank. The appellate court vacated and remanded the district court's ruling that Arab Bank could be held liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) for injuries acquired through terrorist attacks in Israel conducted by Hamas, given the bank's provision of financial services to the organization.

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act: Initial Analysis

Congress has overridden President Obama’s veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). JASTA has been rightly criticized by other commentators (for example here and here); my purpose here is to analyze several of its important features and to raise some questions about how they will be interpreted.

Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Testimony in Opposition to the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act

JASTA invites shrinkage of sovereign immunity abroad that will harm the United States and impede our antiterrorism activities, result in default judgments and refusals to pay rather than any justice to victims, and bizarrely privatizes antiterrorism by leaving it to litigants and judges to determine what states sponsor terrorism.

Subscribe to Lawfare

EmailRSSKindle