Latest in Federal Courts
The ruling will not immediately affect current DACA recipients, but it will bar approval of new applications.
What do recent court decisions mean for the future of congressional oversight?
Significant rulings on two doctrines—standing and scienter—show that Title III’s scope will remain unsettled for a while.
One year ago, President Trump allowed Americans with claims to property confiscated by the Cuban government to sue any entity that “traffics” in that property. But a recent decision by a Florida district court has pruned the list of potential plaintiffs substantially.
How have federal courts adjusted to navigate the COVID-19 outbreak?
On behalf of the University of Texas-Austin’s Strauss Center for International Security and Law, the AALS Section on National Security Law, and Ohio Northern University’s Pettit College of Law, I am pleased to announce that Rebecca Ingber of BU and Shirin Sinnar of Stanford are co-winners of the new Mike Lewis P
On Tuesday Nov. 14, the Solicitor General filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari in In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, an international antitrust case that raises important questions about international comity and the interpretation of foreign law.