Latest in extremism
Introducing a new framework for conceptualizing and categorizing ideologically complex extremists to aid detection, prevention, and deradicalization/disengagement efforts.
From additional granularity in the size and scope of the threat of domestic terrorism to a more forthcoming acknowledgement of its complexity, the new assessment represents a sea change in the U.S. counterterrorism appartus.
As registered nonprofits, violent actors are subsidized on the dime of American taxpayers.
Federal officials must navigate challenges when developing policies on extremism.
The Russian military's poor performance and apparent war crimes demonstrates the hollowness of its hyper-masculine propaganda.
There is a growing problem of extremism in the U.S. military.
White nationalism has a long history in Austrailia that has been reinforced by transnational ties to extremist groups in the United States.
Four factors are driving the increasing hybridization of extremist ideologies.
A look at the guilty pleas so far sheds light on who the defendants are, what their goals were, how evidence is being gathered, and how prosecutors and judges are coping with the largest federal criminal investigation in history.
The current Department of Defense description of extremism prohibits the effects of a problem it does not yet define. A clear definition is needed to address extremism.