Artificial Intelligence
A Digital Regulator Must Be Empowered to Address AI Issues
But not as the overseer of general-purpose AI.
Latest in Artificial Intelligence
But not as the overseer of general-purpose AI.
Broad AI transparency requirements will require well-resourced institutions to translate information into concrete protections that affirm democratic values.
Given the potential power of new AI tools, it’s sensible to place restrictions on them to minimize harm. But it’s also worth thinking about the potential uses of AI that operates free of such restrictions in order to mitigate the risk that such harm will occur.
AI’s vulnerability to adversarial attack is not futuristic, and there are reasonable measures that should be taken now to address the risk.
The State Department’s political declaration on military AI is a good start to building global norms, but the U.S. needs to work with allies to make it a reality.
If ChatGPT is granted First Amendment rights, it won’t be because we are convinced that it has attained human-like personhood.
How does new technology like GAI and extended reality (XR) potentially help or harm legal processes? While courts may benefit from applying GAI and XR, they should be wary of applying them in certain cases where significant life, liberty, and property interests are at stake and ensure that such tech does not replace human discretion.
The solution to the problems associated with AI-generated art may be right in front of our faces: Governments should restrict copyright to humans, and deny it to computer-generated works.
ChatGPT says it won’t write offensive content. We set out to test whether that’s true.
An infinite supply of plausible opinions from fake, AI-powered pundits threatens to crowd out genuine discourse.