Cybersecurity
Cyber ‘Deterrence’: A Brexit Analogy
How “imposing costs on our adversaries” has become the “Brexit means Brexit” of cyberspace
DayZero dives deep in cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and the crime, espionage, and warfare taking place on networked computers. We look at legislation, practice, and litigation over how to keep our networks and critical infrastructure secure; new and emerging threats and how the policy process responds to them; the relationship between cybersecurity other security goods; and cybersecurity in American relations with foreign adversaries and allies.
How “imposing costs on our adversaries” has become the “Brexit means Brexit” of cyberspace
It will fall on the incoming Biden administration to implement the new office—and a great deal of hard work lies ahead.
In this episode, I interview Zach Dorfman about his excellent reports in Foreign Policy about U.S.-Chinese intelligence competition in the last decade. Zach is a well-regarded national security journalist, a senior staff writer at the Aspen Institute’s Cyber and Technology program and a senior fellow at the Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs.
The government has failed to deliver on its promises of greater transparency.
The Biden administration has an important opportunity to rebuild and sustain trust in the software ecosystem by reforming the government vulnerability disclosure process into a more transparent and frequently used system.
This siege has created potentially serious cyber risks for Congress and other affected offices.
Episode 343 of the Cyberlaw Podcast is a long meditation on the ways in which technology is encouraging other nations to exercise soft power inside the United States.
Subscribe to DayZero: Cybersecurity Law and Policy via RSS.