Summary and analysis of the Fourth Circuit oral argument in International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump.
Peter Margulies is a professor at Roger Williams University School of Law, where he teaches Immigration Law, National Security Law and Professional Responsibility. He is the author of Law’s Detour: Justice Displaced in the Bush Administration (New York: NYU Press, 2010).
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
Hawaii v. Trump oral argument in the Ninth Circuit suggests that the case will be heading back to the Supreme Court early next year.
Travel Ban Update: Without Addressing the Merits, the Supreme Court Stays Injunction Pending Further Proceedings
The Supreme Court’s order allows the latest iteration of the travel ban to go into effect, pending further proceedings. However, this latest stay signifies little or nothing regarding the court’s view of the merits in the challenges to EO-3.
Judge Derrick Watson is right to issue a temporary restraining order in Hawaii v. Trump: The newest travel ban violates the Immigration and Nationality Act’s text, structure, and purpose.
The President's September 24 proclamation exceeds the power delegated to the executive under the INA.
The full Supreme Court ordered a stay of part of the Ninth Circuit’s order from last week regarding President Trump’s revised order related to refugees.
Justice Kennedy's stay of the Ninth Circuit's decision last week is the latest in a series of Supreme Court orders striving to balance the equities in Hawaii v. Trump prior to the October 10 oral argument.