Russia is using highly effective methods to conduct cyberattacks, but even the GRU is not immune from mistakes.
Megan Reiss is senior national security fellow with the R Street Institute, where she writes about cybersecurity and other pressing national security issues. Megan joined R Street in September 2017 from Office of U.S. Senator Ben Sasse, for whom she was also a senior national security fellow. Megan has a bachelor’s degree in human biology from Stanford University, an LL.M. in international criminal justice and armed conflict from the University of Nottingham School of Law, and a Ph.D. in public policy from the University of Texas at Austin’s Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
The president’s directive declaring election interference a national emergency is an important bridge, but Congress must continue to deter adversaries through legislative sanctions.
How much confidence does the public have in President Trump’s handling of North Korea?
Social media companies have long taken a hands-off approach to their platforms. It’s time for a more realistic approach.
We conducted a public opinion survey that found that Americans are sensitive to considerations of necessity, proportionality, and congressional authorization when evaluating whether the use of force is a justified response to a military threat from a foreign country. But what if the threat in question isn’t a conventional military one?
John Bolton wants to get rid of the White House cybersecurity coordinator position. What could go wrong?
We set out to design a set of surveys to measure the extent to which public opinion—or, perhaps more accurately, the public’s moral intuition—aligns with legal considerations regarding the use of force. Our results surprised us.