There are not enough ways to fight foreign information operations. Here’s how researchers can start coming up with new ones.
Dr. Herb Lin is senior research scholar for cyber policy and security at the Center for International Security and Cooperation and Hank J. Holland Fellow in Cyber Policy and Security at the Hoover Institution, both at Stanford University. His research interests relate broadly to policy-related dimensions of cybersecurity and cyberspace, and he is particularly interested in and knowledgeable about the use of offensive operations in cyberspace, especially as instruments of national policy. In addition to his positions at Stanford University, he is Chief Scientist, Emeritus for the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies, where he served from 1990 through 2014 as study director of major projects on public policy and information technology, and Adjunct Senior Research Scholar and Senior Fellow in Cybersecurity (not in residence) at the Saltzman Institute for War and Peace Studies in the School for International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. Prior to his NRC service, he was a professional staff member and staff scientist for the House Armed Services Committee (1986-1990), where his portfolio included defense policy and arms control issues. He received his doctorate in physics from MIT.
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
What the National Counterintelligence and Security Center Really Said About Chinese Economic Espionage
The 2015 Obama-Xi agreement on economic espionage does not prohibit all cyber-enabled theft of intellectual property.
A recent poll suggests the importance of not conflating the concepts of campaign “meddling” and cyber issue.
Many issues need to be addressed as Cyber Command implements “command vision” is implemented.
One possible solution.
There is much to commend about a new report on “Encryption Policy in Democratic Regimes,” but the report also leaves a number of important things unsaid.
What to make of the proposed change in the draft Nuclear Posture Review.