On Feb. 27, the Supreme Court issued a 7-1 opinion in Jam v. International Financial Corporation, deciding that international organizations have the same level of immunity from lawsuits granted to foreign governments.
Eliot Kim is a JD candidate at Harvard Law School. Prior to law school he spent three years living in mainland China, including a year studying international relations at the Hopkins-Nanjing Center. Eliot is currently a member of Harvard's International Commercial Arbitration Moot Court Team and has previously been a research intern at the Congressional-Executive Commission on China.
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
The decision to withdraw from the body governing international mail delivery has been widely seen as another salvo in the Trump administration’s campaign against what it deems as unfair trade practices benefitting China.
This new policy, incorporated into a comprehensive review of the U.S. Attorney’s Manual, is the latest Justice Department action to address foreign influence campaigns.
A summary of the latest Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case to make its way to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court ruled that Section 16(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act—defining “crime of violence”—is unconstitutionally vague, and thus violates the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
All you need to know about the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision that vacated a $100 million judgment against Arab Bank.
Duterte’s term as ASEAN chairman comes to a fitting end as the ASEAN statement fails to mention China’s island reclamation and the South China Sea arbitral award.