In dismissing a petition against the rules of engagement governing use of force by the Israeli security forces in the violent clashes in Gaza, the court asserted a controversial interpretation of what international law requires of the Israeli security forces.
Elena Chachko is an SJD candidate at Harvard Law School and a researcher at the Amnon Lipkin-Shahak National Security and Democracy program at the Israel Democracy Institute. She previously completed the LLM program at Harvard Law as a Fulbright scholar. Before coming to Harvard, she clerked for Chief Justice Asher D. Grunis on the Supreme Court of Israel, and worked on national security issues at the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. She holds an LL.B in Law and International Relations from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, where she served as editor in chief of the Hebrew University Law Review. All views expressed here are her own.
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
As promised, President Trump has announced the end of U.S. participation in the Iran nuclear deal and is re-imposing sanctions. Here’s what that will mean in practice.
A new draft paper explores the dynamic between courts and policymakers in the foreign and security domain through an empirical study of the targeted sanctions jurisprudence of the EU courts.
Israel has officially acknowledged a September 2007 strike that destroyed the Al-Kibar nuclear reactor in Syria. The operation is a data point on state practice on preemptive self-defense against nuclear threats.
What would be the constitutional implications of a possible indictment against Prime Minister Netanyahu?
A preliminary analysis of the international legality of each party's actions.
Recent developments provide an opportunity to take stock of the implementation of the Israeli anti-BDS travel ban almost one year after it became law.