There are legitimate reasons to conduct a review of policies and procedures governing national security investigations involving political campaigns. But comments by the president and the attorney general only undermine that work.
Carrie Cordero is a Senior Fellow at the Center for a New American Security. She is also an adjunct professor at Georgetown Law, where she previously served as Director of National Security Studies. She spent the first part of her career in public service, including as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for National Security; Senior Associate General Counsel at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence; Attorney Advisor at the Department of Justice, where she practiced before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court; and Special Assistant United States Attorney.
Subscribe to this Lawfare contributor via RSS.
Acting senior officials don’t have the same practical ability to push back against a president, drive change within their organizations internally or raise issues for congressional attention.
A new CNAS report explores congressional intelligence oversight on Russian election interference and Jamal Khashoggi.
Three recommendations for adapting to the threat posed by far-right violent extremism.
Michael Cohen’s prepared testimony alleges that Donald Trump knew in advance that WikiLeaks would release DNC emails.
While the president can’t unilaterally revise the Constitution and overturn Supreme Court precedent, he can still create an enormous mess by trying.