Skip to content

Tag Archives: United States v. Al Nashiri

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: August 6 Session

By
Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 9:48 AM

This week’s pre-trial session in United States v. Al-Nashiri came to a close yesterday; courtesy of new Lawfare contributor Zoe Bedell, you’ll find summaries of the day’s key developments in our “Events Coverage” section, and links to those summaries below.  Enjoy. 8/6 Motions Hearing #1: Tu Quoque 8/6 Motions Hearing #2: MRIs and Skype

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: August 5 Session

By
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 4:36 PM

A reminder: Lawfare has digests of yesterday’s pre-trial proceedings in United States v. Al-Nashiri available in our “Events Coverage” section; you will find links to Lauren Bateman’s dispatches below, too. 8/5 Motions Hearing #1: Death Penalty Procedures and Mitigation Experts  8/5 Motions Hearing #2: Things Classified 8/5 Motions Hearing #3: Cole Photographs and the Yemen Friendship Agreement 8/5 . . .
Read more »

A Nugget of Real News in General Martins’s Statement

By
Monday, August 4, 2014 at 7:36 AM

Last night, Wells posted a statement by Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins about the weeklong Nashiri hearing getting under way today at Guantanamo. The statement contains the following sentence: “I also assess at the present time that there are no additional prosecutions against Guantanamo detainees that would be made possible by the existence in the military . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: April 27 Session

By
Monday, April 28, 2014 at 4:26 PM

Yesterday, and in a somewhat unusual turn, court and counsel at Guantanamo met for the last day of a pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri.  I’ve got my hands on the transcripts, and will post summaries of yesterday’s big-ticket arguments in our “Events Coverage” section. As per usual, I’ll update this post with . . .
Read more »

Programming Note: Al-Nashiri Coverage This Week

By
Wednesday, April 23, 2014 at 10:02 AM

A little reminder, for the military commissions-inclined and from Lawfare HQ: for the rest of this week, Lawfare unfortunately won’t be almost-live-blogging pre-trial motions litigation in United States v. Al-Nashiri.  Instead, and in keeping with our past “backup” procedure, we’ll opt today, tomorrow and Friday for a different coverage format. That is, Lawfare, in the person of Matt Danzer, will read the . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing Postscript

By
Tuesday, February 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM

Remember how I said Lawfare would return tomorrow, to cover further proceedings in the commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri?  Well, we won’t be doing so after all; it turns out today’s closed session marked the last meeting of this pre-trial hearing. Motions hearings will resume in late April.

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: February 19 Session

By
Wednesday, February 19, 2014 at 4:20 PM

Your correspondent returns to the Fort Meade CCTV outpost, to take in almost-live broadcasts of the day’s hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri.  A little after 0900, we learn the answer to an important question, one left hanging on Monday: whether Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri wants Rick Kammen, his civilian death penalty lawyer, to withdraw from the . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: February 17 Session

By
Monday, February 17, 2014 at 9:06 AM

It’s a snowy day here at the Fort Meade CCTV facility.  Lawfare’s in the house, for the first of this eight-day, pre-trial motions hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri.  Same format as always: dispatches throughout the day, in our “Events Coverage” section, with links to those below. Update [9:32 a.m.]: that was fast.  The case has been postponed . . .
Read more »

Order in Al-Nashiri on Past, Future Monitoring of GTMO Attorney-Client Meetings

By
Thursday, August 8, 2013 at 9:30 AM

Monday’s ruling in United States v. Al-Nashiri, finds, first, that no monitoring  of attorney-client communications has taken place at JTF-GTMO for at least the past two years: Captain Welsh and Colonel Bogdan [until recently JTF-GTMO's Staff Judge Advocate, and currently the Comannder of its Joint Detention Group, respectively] testified convincingly that attorney-client communications have never been monitored . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: June 13 Session

By
Thursday, June 13, 2013 at 8:36 AM

Your correspondent returns to Fort Meade’ Burba Cottage—our usual CCTV venue, Smallwood Hall, being unavailable—to take in another day of piped-in-from-Guantanamo hearings in United States v. Al-Nashiri.  As always, the gong will sound at 9 p.m.; as always, we’ll have almost-live posts up throughout the day in our Events Coverage section, with links to the posts . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: June 12 Session

By and
Wednesday, June 12, 2013 at 8:32 AM

We are back at Fort Meade, ready to cover today’s almost live motions hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri. The festivities will begin at 0900. Read our coverage of yesterday’s hearings here. We will update this post with links to our coverage; those individual posts will be published on our Event Coverage Page. June 12 Session . . .
Read more »

Docketing Orders for Upcoming Sessions in 9/11 and Al-Nashiri Cases

By
Tuesday, March 12, 2013 at 5:37 PM

Mark your calendars. Here’s the agenda for the next hearing in the 9/11 case, which is set to begin on April 22 and to conclude on April 26.   From that document: 3. The Commission will hear argument on the following motions during the session: a. AE 008: Defense Motion to Dismiss For Defective Referral (witness . . .
Read more »

Motions Hearing in the Al-Nashiri Case: February 5 Session

By
Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 12:51 PM

This afternoon, we continue with a second day of almost-live, CCTV-broadcasted hearings in the military commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri.  As always, Lawfare is in the house—Fort Meade’s Smallwood Hall, that is, where your correspondent follows the action piped in from Guantanamo’s Expeditionary Legal Center.  (Ben’s reporting, on yesterday’s session, can be found here.) We expect . . .
Read more »

What to Make of Judge Pohl’s Ruling? Letter Filings in Al-Nashiri v. MacDonald

By
Friday, January 25, 2013 at 3:50 PM

What, if anything, do developments in the military commission case of United States v. al-Nashiri portend for Al-Nashiri v. MacDonald, an ongoing, civil challenge to the accused’s war crimes prosecution?  The question arises in letters filed in the civil case, one by the United States last Friday, and another by al-Nashiri’s lawyers  today. Some quick background: . . .
Read more »

Charging Decisions After Hamdan II and Al-Bahlul: Al-Nashiri Seeks to Dismiss Conspiracy and Terrorism Charges

By
Monday, January 14, 2013 at 8:40 PM

Reported on Friday by the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg: defense attorneys in United States v. Al-Nashiri filed a renewed motion to dismiss the conspiracy charge against their client.  At the same time, the lawyers reactivated an earlier request to throw out a terrorism charge from the capital commission case, one of two ongoing at Guantanamo. The . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri: Delay of Game

By
Friday, January 11, 2013 at 3:46 PM

From the Military Commissions’ website, we learn that the upcoming hearing inUnited States v. Al-Nashiri will be postponed: Pursuant to a request by defense, the military judge has rescheduled the motions hearings originally set for 15-17 January 2013. The new motions hearings will be held on 4-7 February 2013.  

Upcoming Hearings in Al-Nashiri and the 9/11 Case

By
Monday, January 7, 2013 at 1:30 PM

By way of reminder, this month we’ll cover military commission sessions in both of the capital cases pending at Guantanamo.   The commission will hear argument in United States v. Al-Nashiri from Tuesday through Thursday of next week, i.e. from January 15 through January 17.  Judge James Pohl’s docketing order identifies nine agenda items for that . . .
Read more »

Procedural Orders in Al-Nashiri

By
Tuesday, December 11, 2012 at 11:56 AM

Last week, Judge James Pohl handed down five orders in the military commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri—the capital case arising from, among other things, the attack on the USS Cole.   The rulings concern mostly minor issues of procedure and evidence.  Two of them (AE 112c and 113b) conclude, respectively, that the defense’s motions to “end . . .
Read more »

Coverage of Al-Nashiri’s Arraignment: Motions Hearing Part 3

By
Monday, November 14, 2011 at 4:51 PM

At last, you have reached the final post in Lawfare’s coverage of the motions hearing portion of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri’s arraignment. The last argument focused on the defense’s motion to bar Joint Task Force–Guantanamo personnel from reading attorney-client communications in violation of the attorney-client privilege.  This part of the hearing, however, was simply much too long to . . .
Read more »

Coverage of Al-Nashiri’s Arraignment: Motions Hearing Part 2

By
Monday, November 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM

Following discussion of post-acquittal detention, the al-Nashiri motions hearing continued with the defense’s second motion.  This motion involves the defense’s request that Military Judge Pohl allow in camera, ex parte requests to the Convening Authority for expert assistance while only providing minimal notice to the prosecution. A little background information on this issue is warranted.  The defense’s motion centers on . . .
Read more »