Skip to content

Tag Archives: Office of Legal Counsel (OLC)

Krass on Numerous National Security Law Issues

By
Tuesday, December 17, 2013 at 8:06 PM

Caroline Krass had her confirmation hearings today before SSCI to become General Counsel of CIA.  Krass is, in my opinion, wildly qualified for the job, and I hope her confirmation process goes smoothly despite unrelated SSCI-CIA disagreements over the release of SSCI’s critical report on the Bush-era interrogation program.  Of special interest to foreign relations . . .
Read more »

Interesting Letter from CA2 Panel in FOIA Case

By
Monday, September 30, 2013 at 6:02 PM

Just one thing to add to Matt’s preview of tomorrow’s big FOIA argument in the Second Circuit.  A few weeks ago the Second Circuit sent the parties this intriguing letter: Dear Counsel: The panel in the captioned case directs that the Government make available to each member of the panel, for prompt in camera inspection under appropriate security precautions, (1) the . . .
Read more »

The Obama Administration’s National Security Legal Team

By
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 at 10:14 AM

Ben observed last week that in the midst of the most significant war powers debate of this Presidency, many of the top national security legal positions in the Administration remain unfilled.  So who is minding the store?  Fortunately, some very highly qualified and experienced lawyers, all of whom are currently working around the clock. At . . .
Read more »

The Senate Draft AUMF for Syria is Narrower Than the Administration’s Draft, But Still Broad In Some Respects

By
Wednesday, September 4, 2013 at 5:03 AM

The draft Senate Syria AUMF contains a narrower authorization for the use of presidential force than the one the administration proposed.  But it is in some respects still broad, and it actually enhances the president’s claims of independent constitutional authority to intervene in Syria. Before parsing the draft, a few background points to keep in . . .
Read more »

The Potential Relevance of OLC’s Kosovo-War Powers Resolution Opinion to the Syria Debate

By
Monday, September 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM

As Congress moves to debate authorization for the use of force in Syria, and especially since there is some question about whether DOD has adequate funding for a strike in Syria, Congress may want to ponder the votes it took in the not-unrelated context of Kosovo fourteen years ago.  (The original purposes of the Kosovo . . .
Read more »

How Administration Lawyers Are Probably Thinking About the Constitutionality of the Syria Intervention (And A Note on the Domestic Political Dangers of Intervention)

By
Saturday, August 24, 2013 at 11:59 AM

President Obama famously said in 2008 that the President lacks “power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.”  That sentiment as presidential candidate did not stop him as President from intervening in Libya.  But the Libya intervention at least . . .
Read more »

Blockading Cuba???

By
Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 3:43 PM

Earlier today, Jack posted a brief note on a list of old OLC opinions that have just been compiled and released.  One item just leaped out at me from the list — this entry: Authority of the President to Blockade Cuba (January 25, 1961) Note both the subject and the date.  First the subject:  The . . .
Read more »

Release of Old OLC Opinions, 1937-1977

By
Tuesday, July 30, 2013 at 12:26 PM

Via Steve Aftergood at Secrecy News, I see that OLC has published a large cache of old opinions from 1933-1977.  The opinions are all included in one volume.  Highlights for Lawfare readers include: The President’s Power in the Field of Foreign Relations (November 8, 1937) Authority of the President to Blockade Cuba (January 25, 1961) Authority Under International . . .
Read more »

Blaming (or Crediting) the Lawyers for Our Syria Policy

By
Monday, July 15, 2013 at 10:38 AM

This morning both the WSJ (behind paywall) and NYT have stories on how law and lawyers have influenced the changing USG posture on intervening in Syria.  The gist of the WSJ story is that administration lawyers, apparently relying on the ICJ Nicaragua Case, pushed back against policy makers who called for “more assertive U.S. action . . .
Read more »

Today’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Hearing on the Targeted Killing Program

By
Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 3:08 PM

As Greg McNeal noted, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights is holding a hearing this afternoon on the targeted killing program entitled “Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing.” Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were recently all allowed access to the Office of Legal . . .
Read more »

Amicus Support for Samantar Cert Petition

By
Monday, April 15, 2013 at 8:02 PM

What do the Governments of Saudi Arabia and Sri Lanka and former Attorneys General William Barr, Ed Meese, and Dick Thornburgh have in common? Answer:   They all believe that the Supreme Court should grant the petition for certiorari of former Somali Defense Minister Mohamed Ali Samantar, after the Fourth Circuit held that foreign government officials . . .
Read more »

Speaking the Law: The Obama Administration’s Addresses on National Security Law

By and
Thursday, March 28, 2013 at 7:08 AM

We are excited to announce the launch of a project at which we have been hard at work for some time. It’s a book—being published chapter by chapter—by the Hoover Institution Task Force on National Security and Law, explicating and evaluating the Obama Administration’s speeches on national security legal issues. Entitled Speaking the Law The . . .
Read more »

More New York Times Editorial Errors

By
Sunday, March 10, 2013 at 2:03 PM

The New York Times editorial page has still not corrected its error of the other day, when it promoted John Brennan to National Security Adviser. But that hasn’t stopped our friends over there from making some new doozies in this morning’s offering, entitled “Repeal the Military Force Law.” As per my usual practice, I’m going to . . .
Read more »

NYT on Al-Aulaqi Operation and Underlying Legal Analysis

By
Saturday, March 9, 2013 at 4:26 PM

[UPDATED 4:53] Scott Shane, Mark Mazzetti, and Charlie Savage of The New York Times have this lengthy article on the hunt for Anwar Al-Aulaqi.  Their piece describes, among other things, the legal analyses that approved of Al-Aulaqi’s killing. Interestingly, the article says that OLC’s legal workup was influenced by “a legal blog that focused on a statute that . . .
Read more »

Henry V and the Law of Armed Conflict

By
Sunday, March 3, 2013 at 7:11 PM

I went to see a wonderful performance of Henry V this afternoon at the Folger Shakespeare Library—and I came away thinking about the law of armed conflict. I have wondered about early literary invocations of the laws of war before with reference to this play, but perhaps because I haven’t seen Henry V since we founded Lawfare, it hasn’t been . . .
Read more »

Rolling Stone Doesn’t Like Lawfare’s Day on the Hill

By
Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM

Over at Rolling Stone, John Knefel pans the House Judiciary Committee hearing today for being too Lawfare-heavy: The House Judiciary Committee held a full member hearing today on when it is acceptable for the government to designate a U.S. citizen for targeted killing – the first hearing to focus specifically on this hot-button issue. Despite the session’s . . .
Read more »

In Defense of the Administration on Targeted Killing of Americans

By
Wednesday, February 27, 2013 at 10:00 AM

In writing my testimony for today’s House Judiciary Committee hearing on drones and targeted killing of U.S. citizens overseas, I found myself writing a more complete explication of the essential legal rationale underlying the administration’s position on the subject than I have, to date, set down in one place. Some of it was drawn from . . .
Read more »

Feinstein Statement on Intelligence Committee Oversight of Targeted Killings

By
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 at 12:02 PM

Senator Feinstein issued the following press release today: The administration has publicly described—including now in an unclassified white paper—the legality and boundaries of targeted killing of terrorists, though details remain classified. The secrecy of the program has made it difficult to detail the robust oversight conducted by the Intelligence Committee of counterterrorism targeted killings, but I . . .
Read more »

Just Calm Down About that DOJ White Paper

By and
Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 11:56 PM

Okay, everyone, take a deep breath. Chill out. The DOJ’s “White Paper” on targeted killing is no big deal. Really. You wouldn’t know this from reading the somewhat breathless press coverage of the document, much of which offers a reasonable reader some confusion as to what the White Paper actually is. The more responsible reporters have . . .
Read more »

Readings: Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) Letter to John Brennan, CIA Director Nominee, on Targeted Killing of US Citizens Abroad

By
Monday, January 14, 2013 at 5:29 PM

John Brennan, nominated by President Obama to become the next CIA director, will apparently face some tough questioning from Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) at his Senate confirmation hearings (reportedly set for Thursday, February 7, 2:30 pm).  Sen. Wyden has sent Brennan a letter (obtained by Wired’s DangerRoom) on the refusal of the Administration to release . . .
Read more »