Skip to content

Tag Archives: Judge Pohl

Defense Seeks a Temporary Pause in the 9/11 Case

By
Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 2:02 PM

The lawyers’ reason is twofold, apparently: first, a possible lapse in the security of computer networks operated by military commission defense counsel; and second, the disclosure of privileged defense emails to prosecutors by court security personnel. 

James Connell III, an … Read more »

9/11 Case: Defense Lawyers May Visit Detention Facility, Investigate Conditions

By
Friday, February 22, 2013 at 9:55 AM

. . . . but only in 12-hour increments, according to The Chicago Tribune.  Judge Pohl’s order (which is not yet available to the public) apparently rejected the defense’s bid for a 48-hour sleepover at Camp Seven.  From … Read more »

Reminder: Hearings in the 9/11 Case Tomorrow

By
Sunday, January 27, 2013 at 5:29 PM

Ben’s analysis of Charlie Savage’s article on the Chief Prosector prompts this reminder: tomorrow at 9 a.m., Lawfare returns to Smallwood Hall for closed-circuit, piped-in-from-GTMO hearings in the 9/11 case.   There are twenty-five items set for oral argument during this … Read more »

Military Commission Prosecutor’s Filings Regarding 9/11 Conspiracy Charges

By
Saturday, January 26, 2013 at 8:39 AM

The Guantánamo military commissions yesterday released—after a security review—a pair of important filings by the Office of the Chief Prosecutor (OCP), regarding the ongoing controversy over the conspiracy charges against the five 9/11 defendants. (For background, see our prior coverage … Read more »

Appellee Brief in Al-Nashiri v. MacDonald

By
Wednesday, November 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM

Vice Admiral (Retired) Bruce MacDonald, the Convening Authority for the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay, has filed his appellate brief in Al-Nashiri v. MacDonald.  That’s the civilian court lawsuit brought by commission defendant Abd Al Rahim Hussein Al-Nashiri, and now … Read more »

Updated Schedule in the 9/11 Case

By
Wednesday, November 14, 2012 at 11:01 AM

In October, when our most recent motions hearing concluded in United States v. Mohammed et al., the commission’s plan was to convene its next session from December 3 through December 7.

It turns out defense counsel have a scheduling … Read more »