Skip to content

Tag Archives: James Connell

Defense Seeks a Temporary Pause in the 9/11 Case

By
Thursday, April 11, 2013 at 2:02 PM

The lawyers’ reason is twofold, apparently: first, a possible lapse in the security of computer networks operated by military commission defense counsel; and second, the disclosure of privileged defense emails to prosecutors by court security personnel. 

James Connell III, an … Read more »

Preservation of Audiovisual Equipment Ordered in the 9/11 Case

By
Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 11:19 AM

That’s the word from James Connell III, an attorney for 9/11 accused Ammar al-Baluchi.

The commission’s ruling—issued yesterday in connection with the case’s much-discussed “who pressed the buttonepisode—is not yet available, on account of the usual … Read more »

9/11 Defense Counsel on Today’s Al-Bahlul Decision from DCCA

By
Friday, January 25, 2013 at 3:57 PM

Here’s the word from James Connell III, lawyer for 9/11 accused Ammar al-Baluchi.  Note his surmise that the “conspiracy charges issue” may not be up for argument before the military commission until later this spring:

Today, the D.C.

Read more »

An Amended Hearing Agenda, and More Conspiracy Charge News in the 9/11 Case

By
Tuesday, January 22, 2013 at 12:14 PM

Fresh from a security scrub are these two items in United States v. Mohammed et. al.: first, an Amended Docketing order, wherein Judge James Pohl excises two previously scheduled defense motions to compel discovery from the agenda for … Read more »

What the Convening Authority’s Decision Means: Withdrawal Is off the Table, but Dismissal Is Still an Option

By
Friday, January 18, 2013 at 5:23 PM

As Wells noted, the Guantánamo Military Commission Convening Authority has declined to adopt Chief Prosecutor Brig. Gen. Mark Martins’s recommendation to withdraw the conspiracy charges against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and the other 9/11 defendants. Withdrawal, which can be done … Read more »

On the Constitution’s Presumptive Application in the 9/11 Case

By
Tuesday, January 15, 2013 at 5:31 PM

Judge James Pohl apparently has rejected the defense’s bid, in the 9/11 case, to presume (subject to rebuttal) the Constitution’s application to military commission proceedings.

We don’t have the court’s order yet, but we do have this statement from James … Read more »

Court Will Hear Argument from Media and ACLU During 9/11 Case’s Next Session

By
Thursday, August 2, 2012 at 11:35 AM

That’s the word from James Connell III, an attorney for 9/11 defendant Ammar al Baluchi, a.k.a. Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.  The lawyer’s statement is below the fold.

Send to KindleRead more »

One More Small Adjustment to the Schedule in the 9/11 Case

By
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at 1:30 PM

Judge James Pohl has tweaked the calendar in United States v. Mohammed a bit. 

Earlier, the court had pushed back an upcoming August session, in light of Ramadan; that postponement left in place a separate hearing, which had been set … Read more »

Hearing Postponed in the 9/11 Case

By
Monday, July 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM

That’s the word from defense counsel James Connell III: the military commission has granted the defense’s request and rescheduled the August 8-12 motions session for August 22-26.  In seeking the continuance, defense lawyers had argued that the August 8-12 hearing … Read more »

Two Developments in the 9/11 Case

By
Friday, July 13, 2012 at 3:15 PM

Development the first: the defense’s objection to the upcoming August 8, 2012 hearing has cleared security review.  You can read the defense’s arguments as to why that hearing must be postponed – it falls in the middle of Ramadan – … Read more »

9/11 Defense Counsel on “Issues of Abuse”; KSM Files Torture Claim With UN Special Rapporteur

By
Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at 11:47 AM

James Connell III, a lawyer for 9/11 accused Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, has released this statement regarding residual issues related to torture and coercion.  In particular, he says that he and other lawyers expect to raise, at one or more … Read more »

Responses from Three 9/11 Defendants on Severance

By
Saturday, June 2, 2012 at 8:23 AM

According to the Miami Herald’s Carol Rosenberg, only three of the 9/11 defendants weighed in on the question, put to the prosecution by Judge James Pohl, of why the men should not be tried separately.

Rosenberg reports that only … Read more »

Upcoming Motions Hearing Postponed in the 9/11 Case

By
Tuesday, May 29, 2012 at 3:39 PM

That’s the word from a member of the defense team, James Connell.  His statement provides as follows:

This afternoon, the Guantanamo Bay military commission entered an order (AE035C) continuing the hearing scheduled for June 12-15 until August 8-12, 2012. Two

Read more »

A “Gag Order” Regarding Members’ Identities in the 9/11 Case?

By
Thursday, May 24, 2012 at 10:32 AM

The latest statement from the defense in United States v. Mohammed et al:

The prosecution in the 9/11 Guantanamo Bay case is seeking a gag order barring media or military commissions observers from reporting information about military officers the Pentagon

Read more »

Should the 9/11 Defendants Be Tried Separately?

By
Friday, May 18, 2012 at 1:00 PM

So asks Judge James Pohl,  in an order he reportedly issued yesterday in United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al.  A statement from James Connell, a lawyer for 9/11 defendant Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, describes the order in … Read more »

Defense Counsel File Motions Closed-Door Military Commission Proceedings

By
Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 3:03 PM

Defense counsel for the five alleged 9/11 co-conspirators  have filed several motions challenging the closed-door nature of some military commission proceedings.

Although the filings haven’t been released (they need to be reviewed and redacted first), the defense attorneys released two … Read more »