Skip to content

Category Archives: Terrorism Trials: Military Commissions

A New Judge In Al-Nashiri’s Military Commission

By
Friday, July 11, 2014 at 9:04 AM

According to a detailing memorandum issued yesterday (and this piece in the Miami Herald) the new military judge for Al-Nashiri’s military commission will be Air Force Col. Vance Spath. The prior military judge in Al-Nashiri’s case, Army Col. James Pohl, opted to step aside and to assign Spath.  As explained in the memorandum, Pohl did so in . . .
Read more »

USG Opposes Khadr’s Bid to Lift Stay, Vacate Conviction Based on OLC Memo

By
Monday, July 7, 2014 at 4:32 PM

Today, counsel for the United States asked the Court of Military Commission Review (“CMCR”) to bat away Omar Khadr’s recent effort to lift the stay of his appeal to that court, and to have his guilty plea overturned. The D.C. Circuit’s long awaited resolution of al-Bahlul stood to affect Khadr’s appeal; thus the CMCR had stayed the latter, pending further . . .
Read more »

Defense: OLC Memo Supports Invalidation of Omar Khadr’s Conviction

By
Wednesday, July 2, 2014 at 10:20 AM

I am actually a tad surprised that Monday’s filing did not come a touch more quickly.  It seemingly deals quite a whack to Omar Khadr’s 2010 plea of guilty to violations of the Military Commissions Act—including conspiracy, material support, and “murder in violation of the laws of war.”  (The latter is roughly synonymous with participating in hostilities but . . .
Read more »

Statement by Defense Counsel on Effort to Obtain CIA Black Site Evidence in 9/11 Case

By
Monday, June 30, 2014 at 3:44 PM

Detailed defense counsel for Ammar al Baluchi, also known as Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, had the following to say today, about a key filing in the 9/11 case: Today, counsel for Ammar al Baluchi filed a motion to compel the government to produce evidence of CIA torture of Mr. al Baluchi, following a similar order in . . .
Read more »

Global (Statutory) Habeas After Aamer

By
Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM

As my co-authors and I put the finishing touches on the 2014-15 Supplement to Aspen Publishers’ National Security Law and Counterterrorism Law casebooks, I had another thought about the potential consequences of the D.C. Circuit’s February 2014 decision in Aamer v. Obama—about which I’ve blogged a fair amount previously. Recall that, in Aamer, the D.C. Circuit held that the Supreme Court’s decision . . .
Read more »

Relitigating Guantánamo in the Context of Abu Khattala: A Different View

By
Monday, June 23, 2014 at 7:00 AM

As I read Ben’s, Jack’s, John’s Steve’s and Wells’s posts, I come away with the impression that there is unanimous agreement at Lawfare that Abu Khattala (a) cannot be sent to Guantánamo for further interrogation and (b) must be tried in the civil justice system.  As a policy matter, they may be right in this particular case, but I respectfully . . .
Read more »

Chief Prosecutor Statement on Yesterday’s Arraignment in Al-Iraqi

By
Thursday, June 19, 2014 at 10:08 AM

Here it is.  The text opens: Good afternoon. Today Abd al Hadi al-Iraqi—an Iraqi national whose records indicate was born as Nashwan Abd al Razzaq in 1961 in the city of Mosul—was arraigned before a United States military commission on charges that, as a senior member of Al Qaeda, he conspired with and led others . . .
Read more »

Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi Arraignment

By
Wednesday, June 18, 2014 at 1:49 PM

This afternoon, Abd Al-Hadi Al-Iraqi will be arraigned before a military commission at Guantanamo. As per usual, video and audio of the pre-trial proceedings will be zapped, via closed circuit television, to Fort Meade’s Smallwood Hall; and as per usual, Lawfare will travel to Smallwood, view the broadcast and post almost-live dispatches in our “Events Coverage” section. . . .
Read more »

9/11 Case Motions Hearing: June 16 Session

By
Monday, June 16, 2014 at 8:57 AM

At 0900, the fun resumes at Fort Meade’s Smallwood Hall, where (as always) your correspondent will view, via CCTV, pre-trial proceedings in United States v. Mohammed et al.   On the agenda for our two-day mini-hearing: filings and argument bearing on the defense’s discovery, in April, that FBI investigators had questioned a member of Ramzi binalshibh’s . . .
Read more »

Military Commission Charges Approved Against Abd Al Hadi Al-Iraqi

By
Tuesday, June 3, 2014 at 9:41 AM

The Convening Authority’s sign-off came yesterday, and now allows the Guantanamo case to proceed to arraignment.  There are five charges in all—including denying quarter, attacking protected property, using treachery or perfidy, and (importantly) conspiracy, lasting from 1996 to October 29, 2006, to commit those and other offenses.   As readers know well by now, the case tees up an important test within the commissions—both . . .
Read more »

Today in Al-Nashiri

By
Friday, May 30, 2014 at 12:10 PM

No open session today, either; only an ex parte, in camera session between the court and prosecutors. Which is to say: this week’s hearing has come to a close, so far as Lawfare’s coverage is concerned. UPDATE [2:15 p.m.]: the Chief Prosecutor’s remarks on the hearing can be found here.  The opening paragraphs are below.

Today in Al-Nashiri: Closed Session

By
Thursday, May 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM

Today promises only closed argument on the government’s motion to have the military judge reconsider his order for extensive discovery into the CIA’s RDI program.  (Open argument was held yesterday.)  We’ll thus pause our military commissions coverage.  It remains to be seen whether tomorrow will feature open proceedings, or any proceedings at all; stay tuned.

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: May 28 Session

By
Wednesday, May 28, 2014 at 9:49 AM

Down at Guantanamo, pre-trial proceedings will resume this morning in the military commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri.  As always, courtroom discussion will be piped to a closed-circuit viewing facility here at Maryland’s Fort Meade, in almost-real-time.  (There’s a forty-second delay in the audio and video.) We understand that a Rule 505 session—regarding the handling . . .
Read more »

Senators Feinstein and Levin on 9/11 Case Delay, RDI Declassification

By
Friday, May 23, 2014 at 4:30 PM

Made available today: a letter from Senators Dianne Feinstein and Carl Levin, which was sent to President Obama in January of this year and urged him to speed things up in the 9/11 case—chiefly by declassifying additional information regarding the CIA’s long-since-discontinued program of rendition, detention and interrogation. (The Obama Administration’s response, from then-White House Counsel . . .
Read more »

New Trial Date Set for February 2015 in Al-Nashiri

By
Thursday, May 22, 2014 at 1:30 PM

This marks the most significant among many dates set by the Second Amended Scheduling Order, in the military commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri.  The ruling was issued on May 9 (and in response to defense requests), but only recently made its way through Guantanamo’s security morass. It remains to be seen whether this revised schedule will stick. . . .
Read more »

USG Filings in Al-Nashiri

By
Friday, May 16, 2014 at 1:00 PM

There are two: a cross-motion to hold Al-Nashiri’s habeas case in abeyance, pending resolution of his military commission trial at Guantanamo; and a legal memorandum setting forth the government’s arguments, both in support of its motion and in opposition to Al-Nashiri’s bid to have the habeas court preliminarily enjoin the commission.   You’ll find both here, . . .
Read more »

More on Al-Nashiri’s D.C. Habeas Petition

By
Friday, May 9, 2014 at 10:45 AM

Come and get it: a new trove of recently filed and/or unsealed pleadings in the closely watched and vigorously debated case of Al-Nashiri v. Hagel et al.    There you’ll find Al-Nashiri’s motion to supplement his long-running habeas petition, along with the supplemental petition itself and an amicus filing by Professor David Glazier to boot.  (There’s a . . .
Read more »

Confusing Jurisdiction, Abstention, and Substance: A Reply to Peter Margulies

By
Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM

It’s clear from his post this morning that my friend Peter Margulies believes that Al-Nashiri’s new habeas challenge to his trial by military commission, which rests on the claim that the United States was not involved in an armed conflict with al Qaeda at the time of his alleged crimes, is without merit. Unfortunately, Peter’s . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri, the Cole Bombing, and the Start of the Conflict with Al-Qaeda

By
Tuesday, May 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM

The habeas challenge to military commissions recently filed by Abd Al Rahim Al-Nashiri is a loser on both procedure and substance.  Al-Nashiri, the alleged mastermind of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, argues that a federal court can, and should, enjoin his pending commission trial because the charges against him concern acts that occurred . . .
Read more »

Filings from Al-Nashiri’s Habeas Challenge in the D.C. District Court

By
Friday, May 2, 2014 at 11:25 AM

You’ve likely heard: Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, a Guantanamo detainee facing capital military commission charges, last month mounted a new habeas challenge in the district court for D.C.  A few key documents in that litigation were made available yesterday, including Al-Nashiri’s motion for a preliminary injunction, which aims to stop his military trial pending resolution of . . .
Read more »