Skip to content

Category Archives: Media Criticism

Spinning the IMF Report on Iran Sanctions

By
Thursday, February 13, 2014 at 3:04 PM

I am amused today by these two headlines about the IMF’s just-released assessment of Iran’s economy and the effects of remaining sanctions: the New York Times reports that I.M.F. Study Details Perils of Iranian Economy, while the Wall Street Journal reports that Iran’s Economy Improving Amid Nuclear Talks. Since one of the most difficult challenges . . .
Read more »

Looks Like I’m Not Alone in My View of the New York Times Editorial Page

By
Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 4:31 PM

According to the New York Observer, anyway, the news staff seems to agree with me: IT’S WELL KNOWN AMONG THE SMALL WORLD of people who pay attention to such things that the liberal-leaning reporters at The Wall Street Journal resent the conservative-leaning editorial page of The Wall Street Journal. What’s less well known—and about to break into the open, threatening the very . . .
Read more »

Two Thoughts on the Sanger/Shanker Story on NSA Infiltration of Foreign Networks

By
Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 6:56 AM

David Sanger and Thom Shanker have a lengthy story in the NYT about various NSA techniques for penetrating foreign computers and networks, including a strategy for accessing seemingly air-gapped computers.  Two thoughts: First, this article shows how much publication norms have changed in recent years.  (Sanger and Shanker note that the NYT did not publish . . .
Read more »

Describing Bob Litt in Contradictory Terms?

By
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 at 8:04 AM

In his profile yesterday of DNI General Counsel Bob Litt, the Washington Post‘s Greg Miller writes: Litt has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Democratic candidates and causes, and friends describe him in somewhat contradictory terms: an avowed liberal on social issues but a true believer in the propriety of surveillance programs such as those . . .
Read more »

Best Correction of the Month

By
Tuesday, December 24, 2013 at 7:46 PM

From the Financial Times: Apology to His Excellency Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed al Khalifa An article about detainees at Guantanamo Bay in FT Weekend (‘Guantanamo inmates face two divergent paths after 12 years’, Dec 21/22) was mistakenly accompanied by a photograph of Sheikh Khalid bin Ahmed al Khalifa, foreign minister of the Kingdom of Bahrain, . . .
Read more »

My Correspondence with Rick Perlstein: You Decide

By
Monday, December 23, 2013 at 4:13 PM

On Saturday, I posted this piece in response to a particularly slimy blog post on The Nation‘s web site. The post dealt with Lawfare‘s relationship with the New Republic and the sponsorship of our joint Security States project by Northrop Grumman. The post contained preponderantly false information—particularly about Jack—and Perlstein had not bothered to contact either Jack or me . . .
Read more »

Eugene Robinson Gets it Wrong on Drones

By
Tuesday, December 3, 2013 at 7:53 AM

Over at the Washington Post, columnist Eugene Robinson has a piece decrying the morality of drone strikes—a piece that expresses with an admirable economy of words nearly every conceptual error one can make on the subject. Let’s dissect. The problems begin right at the top, where Robinson begins by conceding that “U.S. drone attacks in Afghanistan, Pakistan . . .
Read more »

Disclosing Secrets

By
Tuesday, October 15, 2013 at 9:29 AM

As a short follow up to Ben’s post about the editorial judgment of the Washington Post, I am reminded of what the New York Times Public Editor, Byron Calame said about the SWIFT disclosures, in an opinion piece entitled “Banking Data: A Mea Culpa” (scroll to the second entry on the second page): Since the . . .
Read more »

Blowing Secrets for the Sake of Doing So?

By
Tuesday, October 15, 2013 at 8:45 AM

The Washington Post this morning has the latest Snowden-leaked document story: “The National Security Agency is harvesting hundreds of millions of contact lists from personal e-mail and instant messaging accounts around the world, many of them belonging to Americans, according to senior intelligence officials and top-secret documents provided by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.” The story has a lot of . . .
Read more »

The NSA, the Washington Post, and the Administration

By
Sunday, August 18, 2013 at 12:00 PM

I cannot decide if I am more annoyed at the Washington Post or more annoyed at the Obama administration for the way this latest cache of Snowden-leaked NSA documents is playing. I have now gone through the documents with some care, and I find both the Post’s formulation of the story and the administration’s response to the . . .
Read more »

A Hard-To-Justify Leak

By
Thursday, August 8, 2013 at 9:08 AM

Eli Lake and Josh Rogin have an amazing story at the Daily Beast about how last week’s closure of embassies was prompted by a USG intercept of a conference call of “more than twenty” leaders of AQ and affiliates from around the globe.  In addition to describing the conference call in detail, Lake and Rogin note that . . .
Read more »

More on that Non-Jaw-Dropping, Non-U-Turn by Bill Lietzau

By
Thursday, August 8, 2013 at 2:25 AM

Yesterday, I posted posted this little piece objecting to a Daily Mail story‘s account of its interview with Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense William Lietzau, in which it describes a “jaw-dropping U-turn” by Lietzau on Guantanamo and detention policy. The piece wasn’t mainly about military commissions, but the following passage from Jess Bravin’s book, The Terror Courts: . . .
Read more »

A “Jaw-Dropping U-Turn” Story that Isn’t

By
Wednesday, August 7, 2013 at 8:20 AM

I saw this breathless story in the Daily Mail by reporter David Rose a few hours after seeing William Lietzau, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for detainee matters, at a social event: The Pentagon official in charge of Guantanamo Bay has admitted that if he had his time over, he would have argued that the notorious detention . . .
Read more »

New York Times Edit: “No One Has Questioned the N.S.A.’s Role in Collecting Intelligence Overseas”

By
Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 1:29 AM

The New York Times editorial page is annoyed, though not surprised, that some politicians are trying to exploit the [embassy closure] episode by arguing that it proves the value of the National Security Agency’s domestic intelligence sweeps. On Sunday, Senator Saxby Chambliss, the top Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said of the N.S.A. sweeps: “If . . .
Read more »

The New York Times Declares Al Qaeda Membership Legitimate Political Activity

By
Sunday, April 28, 2013 at 12:00 PM

I was away when the New York Times ran its latest editorial related to national security legal issues, so I’m afraid I did not fly-speck “The Guantanamo Stain” for factual errors.  No matter. It doesn’t really contain many factual errors in the sense of factually-false statements of the type I normally note. It does, however, . . .
Read more »

Memo to the New York Times Editorial Page on Detention and Lawlessness

By
Sunday, April 7, 2013 at 9:14 AM

There are no major factual blunders in yesterday’s New York Times editorial on the Guantanamo Bay hunger strikes, and there’s actually a fair bit in the editorial with which I agree. But I’d be negligent in my duties as the Times‘s Unpaid, Unofficial Ombudsman for Factual Matters in National Security-Oriented Editorials (a title I hereby grant myself) . . .
Read more »

What’s the Deal With the New York Times and Really Bad Drone Humor?

By
Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 10:09 PM

As the co-creator of the Lawfare Drone Smackdown and the publisher (though not the baker) of this drone strike cake, I should perhaps check myself before cringing at other people’s drone humor. But I can’t help but ask at this point what’s going on over at the New York Times? The staid paper of record . . .
Read more »

The New York Times Proposes Judicial Review of Nearly All Drone Strikes

By
Friday, February 15, 2013 at 7:21 AM

I’m not sure if this is by accident or on purpose, but the New York Times yesterday proposed advanced judicial review of a huge swath of targeting in warfare against terrorist groups. Consider the first paragraph of yesterday’s Times editorial, which is entitled “A Court for Targeted Killings“: No American prosecutor can imprison or execute someone except . . .
Read more »

A Brief Word In Response to Jack

By and
Wednesday, February 6, 2013 at 8:43 AM

We don’t disagree with Jack that the filling in of details in the White Paper is important—and didn’t mean to suggest otherwise. But the importance Jack assigns to this aspect of the White Paper is decidedly not what has made it headline news for just about every major news organization in the country. If that were . . .
Read more »

New York Times Renews Call for Guantánamo Prison Closure

By
Monday, November 26, 2012 at 3:33 PM

As Ritika noted earlier today, the New York Times editorial page has renewed its call for the Obama administration to close the prison at Guantánamo Bay. (I’ll take it from Ben’s lack of snark that he judges the Times to have gotten its facts right, so onward with the merits of its argument.) Taking the . . .
Read more »