Skip to content

Category Archives: Field of Application

Does the Armed-Conflict Model Matter in Practice Anymore?

By
Friday, May 24, 2013 at 7:06 PM

This post draws on material from my current book project, the concluding chapter of which considers the legal architecture of counterterrorism in a “postwar” setting…and advances the argument that we already have largely crossed into that world. 

In yesterday’s speech, … Read more »

After the AUMF, II: Daskal and Vladeck Reply

By and
Monday, March 18, 2013 at 7:16 PM

We appreciate Jack’s quick and comprehensive clarification of his views—and of what the CGWW proposal we critiqued last night seeks to achieve. Like Jack, we want to start by emphasizing the many areas of agreement between us and CGWW … Read more »

Goodman Responds to Corn, Blank, Jenks, and Jensen on Capture-Instead-of-Kill

By
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 2:13 PM

The following is a guest post from Ryan Goodman, continuing a conversation begun yesterday in this post from Geoff Corn, Laurie Blank, Chris Jenks, and Eric Jensen.

What the Critics of the “Lesser Evil” Rule (Still) Get Wrong: A Rejoinder Read more »

A Statutory Framework for Next-Generation Threats

By , , and
Monday, February 25, 2013 at 5:30 PM

Several years ago, in a prescient op-ed in the Washington Post, our colleague John Bellinger argued that the September 2001 AUMF was an increasingly poor fit for the evolving threats facing the United States.  It is a theme to which … Read more »

A Guide to Legal Issues Raised by the Expanding Conflict in Mali

By
Friday, January 18, 2013 at 5:08 PM

What is the United States actually doing so far, and what else reportedly is on the table?

1. So far we have agreed to provide airlift support to the French, on their dime.  That is, France is going to pay … Read more »

The ICRC and Slate: An Exchange on Weapons

By
Wednesday, December 5, 2012 at 7:34 AM

The ICRC, on its blog Intercross, has responded to a pair of recent articles in Slate on weapons. It’s an interesting exchange—well worth a look.

First, Slate ran this piece by Brad Allenby and Carolyn Mattick entitled, “Why We Need … Read more »

Beyond the Battlefield, Beyond al Qaeda: The Destabilizing Legal Architecture of Counterterrorism

By
Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 11:42 PM

I’m happy to report that I’ve recently completed drafting an article that has been much on my mind for the past few years.  Beyond the Battlefield, Beyond al Qaeda: The Destabilizing Legal Architecture of Counterterrorism (Michigan Law Review, forthcoming 2013) … Read more »

Eviatar on Whether the Courts Can Make an Armed Conflict Determination on Grounds Not Specifically Advanced by the Government

By
Friday, July 20, 2012 at 4:01 PM

In response to my post contending that the United States is party to an armed conflict in Yemen pitting AQAP and the government of Yemen against one another, Daphne Eviatar of Human Rights First writes in to advance the argument … Read more »

Reactions to the ACLU Suit: There Is Armed Conflict in Yemen, and the US Is Party to It

By
Wednesday, July 18, 2012 at 12:48 PM

As Ben says, there is a lot to talk about with respect to al-Aulaqi v. Panetta, a civil suit filed today by the ACLU and CCR in an attempt to obtain money damages for airstrikes conducted by the United … Read more »

Guest Post from the ICRC’s Daniel Cahen Responding to My Post on Syria/LOAC

By
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 11:28 AM

Daniel Cahen, the Legal Advisor to the ICRC’s Regional Delegation for the United States and Canada, responds to my original post on Syria/LOAC with the following guest post:

The publication of an interview about Syria given by my colleague Hicham

Read more »

Rona Responds to My Post on Syria and LOAC

By
Tuesday, July 17, 2012 at 10:52 AM

Gabor Rona responds to my earlier post (and Kevin Heller’s reply) on Syria and LOAC:

 1) I agree fully with Kevin. And let me know if I’ve misunderstood anyone here, but my understanding of the historic ICRC position is

Read more »

Heller Responds to My Post on Syria and LOAC

By
Monday, July 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM

Kevin Heller writes in with the following observation in response to my post yesterday on Syria/LOAC:

I liked your post on Syria and the ICRC, but this statement gave me pause: “The ICRC’s past and present approach to Syria, as

Read more »

The War in Syria and LOAC: Some Key Issues

By
Sunday, July 15, 2012 at 4:42 PM

[Update: a responsive post from ICRC's Daniel Cahen is here, and ones from Kevin Heller and Gabor Rona are here and here]

Many papers and sites are today highlighting the fact that the ICRC has stated publicly that … Read more »

John Brennan’s Speech: The Tree that Fell in the Forest?

By
Monday, May 7, 2012 at 7:28 PM

It is surprising to me that neither the Washington Post nor the New York Times nor the Wall Street Journal has yet to run an editorial reacting to John Brennan’s extensive and thoughtful speech on drones last week.

A senior … Read more »

Not Joining the Issues

By
Thursday, May 3, 2012 at 4:52 PM

Yesterday I posted a lengthy response to Gabor Rona’s critique of the Brennan speech, and Gabor has now replied to my comments.  Alas, we seem to be speaking past one another in various ways (for example, I critiqued what I … Read more »

Greetings, and a Quick Thought on Brennan’s Speech

By
Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 2:23 PM

Very glad to have joined the Lawfare team.  I look forward to more sustained blogging once the spring grading season is over.  For now, I’ll offer just a quick thought on the speech John Brennan delivered yesterday, and on the … Read more »

John Brennan’s Speech and the ACLU FOIA Cases

By
Tuesday, May 1, 2012 at 11:12 AM

John Brennan’s speech yesterday was important for at least three reasons: (1) it marked the first official White House acknowledgment that “the United States Government conducts targeted strikes against specific al-Qa’ida terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to … Read more »

Text of John Brennan’s Speech on Drone Strikes Today at the Wilson Center

By
Monday, April 30, 2012 at 12:50 PM

 

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EMBARGOED UNTIL DELIVERY

April 30, 2012

 

Remarks of John O. Brennan – As Prepared for Delivery

Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism

Woodrow Wilson International Center for Read more »

John Brennan’s Speech

By
Monday, April 30, 2012 at 12:46 PM

Last October, I wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post entitled “Will Drone Strikes Become Obama’s Guantanamo?” in which I said that “the administration needs to work harder to explain and defend its use of drones as lawful … Read more »

Yemen Is a Hot Battlefield

By
Wednesday, March 7, 2012 at 11:10 AM

In the ongoing debate over the use of lethal force against persons located outside Afghanistan, the suggestion is often made (both by supporters and critics of US government policies) that Afghanistan is a “hot battlefield” whereas places like Yemen are … Read more »

Is DPH the Relevant Standard in Pakistan? An Important Element in the Debate Missing from BIJ’s Report

By
Monday, February 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM

[Note: a reader responded that I missed the point that an important point about the underlying BIJ report, one that puts the "A Question of Legality" component of the report in a different light. Specifically, the reader emphasizes that the Read more »

The United States as a Party to an AQAP-Specific Armed Conflict in Yemen

By
Tuesday, January 31, 2012 at 10:34 AM

Drone strikes in Yemen raise important questions regarding the field of application of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), the extraterritorial applicability of International Human Rights Law (IHRL), and the proper approach to norm reconciliation should both IHL and IHRL apply simultaneously.  … Read more »