Skip to content

Category Archives: Guantanamo: Transfers and Resettlement

Findings, Conclusions and Areas of Dispute Between the SSCI Report, the Minority and the CIA: Part 2

By and
Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 9:46 PM

Below, you will find the second installment in our ongoing effort to identify, in summary form, key areas of dispute as between the SSCI, the SSCI minority, and the CIA with regard the CIA’s detention and interrogation program. As you surely know by now, all three today released long-anticipated reports regarding the CIA’s post-9/11 detention and . . .
Read more »

There Is a Recent Silver Lining for Gitmo Policy – But It’s Not What People Have Been Talking About

By
Monday, December 8, 2014 at 7:06 AM

The new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is likely to extend the ban on any transfers of Guantanamo detainees into the United States but ease restrictions on transfers to other countries. Some commentators are hailing this as a decent compromise, containing some silver lining for the White House’s proclaimed policy of closing Guantanamo (see here . . .
Read more »

Six More Guantanamo Transfers—to Uruguay

By
Sunday, December 7, 2014 at 9:09 AM

Here’s the news from the New York Times this morning: WASHINGTON– The United States transferred six detainees from the Guantánamo Bay prison to Uruguay this weekend, the Defense Department announced early Sunday. It was the largest single group of inmates to depart the wartime prison in Cuba since 2009, and the first detainees to be resettled in South America. The . . .
Read more »

5 Guantanamo Detainees Transferred to Europe Today

By
Thursday, November 20, 2014 at 2:33 PM

At the Miami Herald, Carol Rosenberg reports that the Pentagon today transferred 5 inmates at Guantanamo Bay to two countries in Europe. According to Rosenberg, three of the detainees were sent to Georgia. Of that trio, Abdul Khaled al Baidani and Abdel Ghalib Hakim are Yemeni nationals, while Salah Mohammed al Thabbi is Tunisian. Two other detainees . . .
Read more »

Detainee Transferred from Afghanistan to US for Trial: A Model for GTMO Closure?

By
Tuesday, November 4, 2014 at 6:28 PM

A very interesting development today with respect to the ongoing effort to complete the shut-down of US-administered military detention in Afghanistan: As you may recall, we have long since ceased holding any Afghans in military detention in Afghanistan, but we have maintained a rump population of non-Afghan detainees in our control. It has been clear . . .
Read more »

PRB Recommends Repatriation for One Saudi Detainee, Continued Detention for Another

By
Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 2:56 PM

Yesterday the Periodic Review Board recommended the repatriation of Muhammad Murdi Issa al-Zahrani, a Saudi detainee who has been held in Guantanamo for 12 years after being captured in Afghanistan in 2002. The Board’s short statement concluded that given the “uncorroborated nature” of Zahrani’s association with Al Qaeda, his lack of ties to at-large extremists, and . . .
Read more »

Signing Statements, the Commander in Chief Power, and Guantanamo Closure

By
Friday, October 10, 2014 at 4:00 PM

According to the Wall Street Journal,  the President’s people are “drafting options” to bring about Guantanamo’s closure, an objective that would require the White House to get around a statutory restriction on transferring GTMO detainees to the United States.  Or not: Vice’s Jason Leopold reports that NSC Spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden today said the Administration does not know what “‘new press . . .
Read more »

More Partisanship Over Guantanamo Closure

By
Friday, October 10, 2014 at 3:16 PM

Congressional Republicans are reportedly rushing to condemn the White House’s alleged consideration of ways to close Guantanamo and move detainees to the United States despite legislative prohibitions.   Senator Pat Roberts has vowed to “shut down the Senate” if the President tries to bring Guantanamo detainees to the United States (Fort Leavenworth is in his home state . . .
Read more »

Unilateral Executive Action to Close Guantanamo? Bah!

By
Friday, October 10, 2014 at 10:32 AM

The estimable Carol E. Lee and Jess Bravin, over at the Wall Street Journal, are reporting this morning that: The White House is drafting options that would allow President Barack Obama to close the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, by overriding a congressional ban on bringing detainees to the U.S., senior administration officials said. Such a . . .
Read more »

Administration Response to GAO Report on Bergdahl

By
Saturday, August 23, 2014 at 12:00 PM

Here’s the government’s response to the GAO report, to which Wells linked yesterday, concluding that the Bergdahl trade violated the law. A statement from Pentagon Press Secretary Rear Admiral John Kirby reads: As Secretary Hagel has testified before Congress, the recovery of SGT Bergdahl was conducted lawfully. This decision was made after consultation with the Department . . .
Read more »

GAO: Defense Department Violated Law In Bergdahl-GTMO Detainee Swap

By
Thursday, August 21, 2014 at 4:05 PM

So concludes this report from the Government Accountability Office, which apparently was written in response to a request by various Senators.  The document opens: This responds to your June 13, 2014, request for our opinion on whether the Department of Defense (DOD) incurred obligations in violation of section 8111 of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2014 . . .
Read more »

Global (Statutory) Habeas After Aamer

By
Wednesday, June 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM

As my co-authors and I put the finishing touches on the 2014-15 Supplement to Aspen Publishers’ National Security Law and Counterterrorism Law casebooks, I had another thought about the potential consequences of the D.C. Circuit’s February 2014 decision in Aamer v. Obama—about which I’ve blogged a fair amount previously. Recall that, in Aamer, the D.C. Circuit held that the Supreme Court’s decision . . .
Read more »

The Obviously Unconstitutional Cotton Amendment

By
Thursday, June 19, 2014 at 4:30 PM

Among the proposed amendments to the DOD appropriations bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives is this doozy, courtesy of Arkansas Rep. Tom Cotton: None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used to transfer or release any individual detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, . . .
Read more »

Two Legal Takeaways from Yesterday’s HASC Hearing

By
Thursday, June 12, 2014 at 9:19 AM

Yesterday’s HASC Committee Hearing (video here) on the Bergdahl swap was pretty eventful.  At least two important legal issues were discussed: the legality of not notifying Congress about the swap, and the legal consequences of the end of the Afghan conflict.  The first has received the most attention, but the administration arguably made some underappreciated news . . .
Read more »

The Bergdahl Swap: Who Kicked Off the “Political Football” Game?

By
Friday, June 6, 2014 at 10:23 AM

President Obama complained yesterday that Sergeant Bergdahl is “not a political football.”   That should be true, but unfortunately President Obama is responsible for kicking off the football game by announcing the Taliban-Bergdahl swap in a Rose Garden appearance, rather than leaving the announcement to Secretary Hagel and Chairman Dempsey.  The White House should not be . . .
Read more »

Vice-President Cheney’s Funny Criticism of President Obama for Not Complying with the GTMO Notice Requirement

By
Wednesday, June 4, 2014 at 4:46 PM

I laughed when I heard former Vice-President Cheney on the Laura Ingraham show (approximately the 8:15-9:10 mark) criticizing President Obama for not notifying Congress under Section 1035 of the 2014 NDAA about the Bergdahl swap.  Ingraham complained about the failure of members of Congress to stand up to “the flouting of American law,” including the “failure . . .
Read more »

The Administration’s New (and Unconvincing) Reading of the Notice Requirement for GTMO transfers

By
Tuesday, June 3, 2014 at 11:04 AM

The Obama Administration has backed away from its suggestions over the weekend that it failed to comply with the notice requirement in Section 1035 of the 2014 NDAA on constitutional grounds.  It is now claiming, as Marty Lederman notes, that it complied with the statute because it determined “that the notification requirement should be construed not to . . .
Read more »

One or Two Other Statutes the President Likely Disregarded in The Bergdahl Deal [UPDATED]

By
Monday, June 2, 2014 at 7:45 PM

Earlier today I explained why the President almost certainly disregarded Section 1035 of the 2014 NDAA when he swapped the GTMO detainees for Bergdahl.  The President probably disregarded another statute as well, Section 8111 of the Fiscal Year 2014 Consolidated Appropriations Act, which provides: None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available in this Act may . . .
Read more »

Thoughts on the Bergdahl-for-Taliban Trade

By
Monday, June 2, 2014 at 4:30 PM

What do you give up to get back one of your own? Talk about a hard national security choice. The decision to trade five senior Taliban detainees at Guantanamo for Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl has it all. I don’t envy the people who had to make this decision. The United States is not Israel—a fierce . . .
Read more »

The President Pretty Clearly Disregarded a Congressional Statute in Swapping GTMO Detainees for Bergdahl

By
Monday, June 2, 2014 at 1:03 PM

Marty Lederman tries mightily to interpret Bergdahl’s release as consistent* not inconsistent with the wishes of Congress, but I don’t think he succeeds. Section 1035 of the 2014 NDAA authorizes the Defense Secretary to “transfer or release any individual detained at Guantanamo” if he makes certain certain determinations, and it further requires without exception that the . . .
Read more »