Skip to content

Category Archives: Executive Power

Consensus on the Way Forward for an ISIL AUMF

By
Friday, February 27, 2015 at 11:30 AM

Even casual readers of this blog are likely aware of the longstanding (and thoroughly joined) debate between Ben and me with respect to how Congress ought to update / revisit the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force. That’s why I was pleasantly surprised by both Ben’s prepared testimony before yesterday’s House Armed Services Committee . . .
Read more »

HASC Testimony: Towards a Better AUMF

By
Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 10:00 AM

Prepared Testimony of Robert Chesney Charles I. Francis Professor in Law Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Director, Strauss Center for International Security & Law The University of Texas at Austin Before the House Armed Services Committee  February 26, 2015 “Outside Perspectives on the President’s Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Islamic . . .
Read more »

HASC Testimony: An Alternative to the Administration’s AUMF Draft

By
Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 10:00 AM

Prepared Statement of Benjamin Wittes Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution before the House Committee on Armed Services “Outside Perspectives on the President’s Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” February 26, 2015 Thank you Chairman Thornberry, Ranking Member Smith, and members of the committee . . .
Read more »

Live: Benjamin Wittes and Bobby Chesney Testify Before HASC on AUMF

By
Thursday, February 26, 2015 at 9:50 AM

At 10 am, Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes and Bobby Chesney, along with General Jack Keane, will provide testimony before the House Armed Services Committee today regarding the Obama administration’s proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force against ISIL.  Ben’s and Bobby’s prepared statements will follow in subsequent posts. You can watch the proceedings here on . . .
Read more »

Presidential Power and Enjoining the Obama Immigration Plan

By
Wednesday, February 18, 2015 at 11:00 AM

Monday’s district court decision enjoining President Obama’s immigration plan, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA), was a strong rebuke of presidential overreaching, although it was framed as a decision on the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). (Full disclosure: I was co-counsel on an amicus brief by the Cato Institute; see here for Cato’s take on . . .
Read more »

Argument Recap: The Critical Difference in How al-Nashiri Loses

By
Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:03 PM

If one thing was clear from Tuesday morning’s 61-minute argument before the D.C. Circuit in In re al-Nashiri, in which a Guantánamo military commission defendant seeks to challenge on constitutional grounds the composition of the intermediate Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) assigned to hear the government’s interlocutory appeal in his case (which I previewed here), it was that . . .
Read more »

al-Nashiri Argument Preview: The CMCR’s Appointments Clause Problem

By
Tuesday, February 3, 2015 at 8:17 AM

Next Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the D.C. Circuit (Henderson, Rogers, & Pillard, JJ.) is set to hear oral argument in In re al-Nashiri, the latest in a long-line of pre-trial disputes arising out of the Guantánamo military commission proceedings against Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed al-Nashiri, who is accused of involvement in two terrorist attacks . . .
Read more »

A Response to Bruce Schneier and a Cautious Defense of Energy in the Executive

By
Friday, January 16, 2015 at 3:30 PM

Bruce Schneier has responded to my earlier exchange with Edward Snowden with a challenging question: Putting aside what the Constitution currently does or does permit, wouldn’t it be better if all surveillance decisions were subject to judicial review? Shouldn’t we prefer philosophically an executive bound to formal review mechanisms in all coercive activities—even, say, in overseas surveillance . . .
Read more »

What Americans Really Think About ISIS

By
Friday, January 9, 2015 at 6:16 PM

This week, Brookings unveiled a new poll by Nonresident Senior Fellow Shibley Telhami that dives below the”approve/disapprove” numbers to offer a more sophisticated picture of how the American public views the campaign against the Islamic State and the broader conflict in Syria and Iraq. Among the findings, one of the most striking is the reasoning respondents select . . .
Read more »

Two Basic Problems With Abstention in Nashiri

By
Tuesday, December 30, 2014 at 5:44 PM

Wells already flagged yesterday’s D.D.C. decision by Judge Roberts, refusing to enjoin Abd Al Rahim Hussayn Muhammad Al Nashiri’s impending trial by military commission, and abstaining from reaching the merits of his habeas petition until and unless he’s convicted and is unsuccessful in the direct post-conviction appeal provided by the Military Commissions Act. Interested (or, at least, hyper-attentive) readers may . . .
Read more »

The D.C. Circuit’s Mandamus Jurisdiction and the Legitimacy of the Military Commissions

By
Sunday, December 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM

It now appears that the next military commissions case in which the D.C. Circuit will hear oral argument is that of Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri (“Nashiri”), with oral argument scheduled before an as-yet unnamed three-judge panel on Tuesday, February 10, 2015. And although the underlying “merits” issue in Nashiri is hyper-narrow (whether two of the three judges set to hear . . .
Read more »

A “Buffer Zone” Inside Syria, and Its Complications

By
Friday, December 5, 2014 at 6:34 PM

The United States and Turkey seem to be having increasingly detailed discussions about establishing a no-fly zone (or “buffer zone”) inside the northern Syrian border adjacent to Turkey. The press reports that Turkey is conditioning the U.S. use of Turkey’s Incirlik air base for armed flights on the U.S. willingness to establish such a zone. The . . .
Read more »

What Does the Swiss Coat of Arms Have to do with the Immigration Imbroglio?

By
Wednesday, November 26, 2014 at 2:36 PM

If you peruse the darker corners of the U.S. criminal code—as I used to do in my youthful efforts to educate myself in law without going to law school—you’ll eventually stumble across 18 U.S.C. § 708, which bizarrely makes it a federal crime to “willfully use[] . . . for any trade or commercial purpose, the coat of . . .
Read more »

Risking Money and Risking Lives: Disproportionate Congressional Oversight

By
Tuesday, November 25, 2014 at 8:00 AM

The Government Performance Results Act (GPRA) requires the Executive Branch to conduct detailed strategic planning prior to spending money.  The laws that govern the President when he introduces the men and women of the United States (U.S.) Armed Forces into hostilities, specifically Article II of the Constitution, the War Powers Resolution, and the Authorizations for . . .
Read more »

On the Oddity of the Patriot Act Sunset Provisions

By
Monday, November 24, 2014 at 10:00 AM

Last week, the New York Times‘s Charlie Savage had what seems to me a pretty big, if under-discussed, scoop—or perhaps we should say that he channelled to the public a pretty big scoop by former Senate Intelligence Committee chief counsel Michael Davidson. The news, which certainly caught me unawares, is that the Patriot Act sunset provision—stated . . .
Read more »

Analysis of Senator Paul’s Proposed Declaration of War (and Authorization of Force) Against the Islamic State

By
Monday, November 24, 2014 at 8:15 AM

Senator Paul has proposed a declaration of war and authorization of force against the Islamic State.  A few reflections, drawn in part from an article I wrote a decade ago with Curtis Bradley: 1.     The United States has declared war in five armed conflicts in American history: The War of 1812, the Mexican-American . . .
Read more »

President Obama’s Immigration Plan: Rewriting the Law

By
Sunday, November 23, 2014 at 4:15 PM

As a supporter of comprehensive immigration reform and director of Roger Williams Law School’s Immigration Clinic, I know the high stakes in the current debate about President Obama’s executive action. I also know the higher stakes, previously acknowledged by the President, in adherence to our constitutional order; see my recent paper supporting the President’s Deferred . . .
Read more »

The Immigration Imbroglio as (Pretty) Normal Separation of Powers

By
Saturday, November 22, 2014 at 10:03 AM

It has been instructive during the last six years to watch President Obama and most Democrats evolve from Executive power critics to Executive power apologists, just as it has been instructive to watch many Republicans evolve from Executive power apologists (or quiet fence-sitters) to Executive power critics.  It has also been instructive to watch President . . .
Read more »

Executive Power and Immigration Reform

By
Monday, November 17, 2014 at 11:33 PM

The current flap about President Obama’s plan to proceed without Congress on immigration matters isn’t really about national security law. But it is about the law of presidential power and thus of inherent interest to readers of this site. Over the past few weeks, I’ve been struck in reading the many news stories about the brewing . . .
Read more »

Ben’s Sweeping Endorsement of the Just Security AUMF Principles

By
Tuesday, November 11, 2014 at 12:32 PM

In his post this morning, Ben identifies what he calls “flaws” with three of the six principles for a use-of-force authorization for ISIL that were introduced yesterday by a group of legal experts (that includes me). Although Ben has done us the courtesy of critiquing the Principles, it appears he didn’t actually read them all . . .
Read more »