Skip to content

Category Archives: Event Coverage: Military Commissions: Al Nashiri Case

ICYMI: Coverage of Last Week’s Hearing in Al-Nashiri

By
Monday, November 10, 2014 at 10:44 AM

ICYMI, GTMO policy folks: Matt Danzer’s final round of digests on last week’s hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri can be found below, and in our “Events Coverage” section.  (Earlier coverage of the hearing is here, too.) Enjoy. 11/5 Session #4: Statements, Transcripts, and Questionnaires 11/6 Session: Fighting Over MRIs and Hearsay

11/6 Session: Fighting Over MRIs & Hearsay

By
Monday, November 10, 2014 at 10:38 AM

Thursday’s session opens with an update on AE 284, the defense motion seeking Skype calls for Al-Nashiri, from prosecution attorney Col. Robert Moscati. The prosecution has learned that the Guantanamo administrators expects to be able to provide direct interactive communication between high-value detainees and their family members by the end of the year. The parties . . .
Read more »

11/5 Session #4: Statements, Transcripts, and Questionnaires

By
Monday, November 10, 2014 at 10:37 AM

The final session for the day begins with AE 314C, a defense motion to compel testimony at the hearing on a defense motion to suppress statements made by Al-Nashiri. Capt. Daphne Jackson explains that in order for the defense to prove the underlying motion—seeking suppression of some of Al-Nashiri’s statements due to the length of his detention . . .
Read more »

11/5 Session #3: On the Necessity of the Death Penalty

By
Friday, November 7, 2014 at 6:32 PM

The parties return for the afternoon session and Judge Spath begins by laying out his thinking on the previous motion seeking supervised telephone and Skype calls between Al-Nashiri and his family. In the interest of moving this issue forward, the judge would like to understand why a supervised and delayed-transmission telephone or Skype conversation between Al-Nashiri and his family is unacceptable . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: Nov. 5 Session

By
Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:04 AM

Hey GTMO fans: the estimable Matt Danzer’s digests of yesterday’s hearing in this capital Guantanamo military commissions case can be found below, and in our “Events Coverage” section. Keep an eye on this space; we will update this post with more digests throughout the day. 11/5 Session #1: Arguing to Reargue 11/5 Session #2: Skyping with HVDs . . .
Read more »

11/5 Session #2: Skyping With HVDs

By
Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 10:00 AM

The commission returns from recess and prepares to consider AE 284 and 284L, a defense motion and supplement seeking to allow Al-Nashiri to hold supervised Skype calls with his elderly parents. Before that, however, defense attorney Richard Kammen informs Judge Spath that Al-Nashiri has an upset stomach due to his transportation and would like a corpsman to bring some dissolvable . . .
Read more »

11/5 Session #1: Arguing to Reargue

By
Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 9:50 AM

Military judge Vance Spath opens Wednesday’s motions proceedings with AE 181G, a defense request to reargue the underlying defense motion to remove the possibility of the death penalty for Al-Nashiri if he is not given access to classified information presented against him. Judge Spath notes that after the parties argued the underlying motion in February, . . .
Read more »

This Week’s Hearing in Al-Nashiri

By
Wednesday, November 5, 2014 at 9:03 AM

A little programming note here, y’all: today marks the first of a two-day, pre-trial hearing in the military commission case of United States v. Al-Nashiri.  But Lawfare unfortunately won’t be in the house, so to speak—which is to say that your correspondent will not be able to schlep out to Fort Meade, to watch and report back on . . .
Read more »

Chief Prosecutor Statement on This Week’s Hearing in Al-Nashiri

By
Wednesday, November 5, 2014 at 6:13 AM

Brig. Gen. Mark Martins’ remarks on the two-day pre-trial session, which commences today, can be found here.  (Note that the hearing will proceed, despite the pendency of the United States’ appeal of the dismissal of charges relating to Al-Nashiri’s alleged role in an attack on the M/V Limburg.) From the statement: Between pre-trial sessions, significant work . . .
Read more »

World War II-Era Herbert Weschler Memo on Conspiracy as War Crime

By
Monday, September 8, 2014 at 4:20 PM

This is a pretty interesting document: A 1944 memo from Herbert Weschler, then assistant attorney general, outlining the U.S. government’s developing view of conspiracy as a war crime. The interesting thing is how similar the internal discussion of the subject in 1944 is to the one going on now in the Bahlul case—and how similar . . .
Read more »

8/11 Session #1: Severance, Reconsidered

By
Monday, August 11, 2014 at 10:25 AM

The military judge, Army Col. James Pohl, takes the bench.  Only one accused is present: Ramzi Binalshibh, whose case the court recently separated out from that against the other four accused in the 9/11 case.  His lawyers are there too, including Jim Harrington and LCDR Bogucki. The court opens by summarizing the state of play, . . .
Read more »

8/6 Motions Hearing #2: MRIs and Skype

By
Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 10:19 AM

When the court returns from recess, the parties move into argument on AE277, the defense’s motion for a judicial order compelling an MRI of Al-Nashiri’s brain to determine if he has brain damage. The defense presents two lines of argument. First, Rick Kammen, Al-Nashiri’s Learned Counsel, says his client needs the MRI for medical treatment, and . . .
Read more »

8/6 Motions Hearing #1: Tu Quoque

By
Thursday, August 7, 2014 at 9:44 AM

Judge Spath begins today’s hearings noting that Al-Nashiri is not present. The court first hears testimony from the Guantanamo Staff Judge Advocate who had received Al-Nashiri’s waiver, Captain G, who walks through the standard certifications that the waiver was voluntary. The proceedings quickly turn contentious. Learned Defense Counsel Richard Kammen then stands and questions Captain . . .
Read more »

8/5 Motions Hearing #4: On the MCA’s Constitutionality and Statutes of Limitation

By
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 8:16 PM

Judge Spath then moves to AE 295, a defense filing and the penultimate item on the agenda.  It’s a constitutional broadside against the commissions’ authorizing legislation. Major Hurley rises for the defense and asks that all charges be dismissed against al-Nashiri, “because the Military Commissions Act of 2009 is unconstitutional, specifically because it is designed . . .
Read more »

8/5 Motions Hearing #3: Cole Photographs and the Yemen Friendship Agreement

By
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 6:12 PM

In the final session for the day, Judge Spath announces he has come to a ruling on AE277.  This is the defense’s bid for Al-Nashiri to have an MRI examination, presumably in order to unearth the damage wrought by his abuse at CIA hands. The item had been the subject of a secret Rule 505(h) . . .
Read more »

Al-Nashiri Motions Hearing: August 5 Session

By
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 4:36 PM

A reminder: Lawfare has digests of yesterday’s pre-trial proceedings in United States v. Al-Nashiri available in our “Events Coverage” section; you will find links to Lauren Bateman’s dispatches below, too. 8/5 Motions Hearing #1: Death Penalty Procedures and Mitigation Experts  8/5 Motions Hearing #2: Things Classified 8/5 Motions Hearing #3: Cole Photographs and the Yemen Friendship Agreement 8/5 . . .
Read more »

8/5 Motions Hearing #2: Things Classified

By
Wednesday, August 6, 2014 at 9:15 AM

When the Court reconvenes, Major Tom Hurley begins argument on AE 280. In it, the defense requests that summaries of classified discovery be marked with more granular classification information.  Specifically, the defense objects to the government’s practice of marking whole documents as classified; instead, the defense wants the government to go through the process of reviewing the . . .
Read more »

8/5 Motions Hearing #1: Death Penalty Procedures and Mitigation Experts

By
Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 10:10 PM

The military judge, Air Force Col. Vance Spath, begins the morning’s hearing in United States v. Al-Nashiri—his second on the case—by ruling on two pending motions. First, Judge Spath grants defense motion AE 305, in which the detainee’s lawyers had asked the new military judge to block his predecessor, Army Col. James L. Pohl from resolving certain outstanding motions . . .
Read more »

8/4 Session #5: Things 120, Part Two

By
Monday, August 4, 2014 at 4:03 PM

CIA discovery—the subject of Judge Pohl’s ruling in AE120C, and a subsequent order on reconsideration—is still before us. In motion AE120BB, the defense seeks a timeline for getting its hands on such discovery under Judge Pohl’s order. Maybe AE120BB will be moot in time, forecasts Al-Nashiri’s Learned Counsel, Richard Kammen. In the event that it . . .
Read more »

8/4 Motions Hearing #4: Things 120, Part One

By
Monday, August 4, 2014 at 2:35 PM

And lo, defense motion AE120S is before us. In it, the defense moves to compel production of an index of outstanding and denied discovery. But its not just any discovery we’re talking about, as Capt. Daphne Jackson explains: no, this index concerns the discovery, ordered by Judge Pohl in AE120C, into Al-Nashiri’s quite secret and . . .
Read more »