Skip to content

Email Rick

Posts by Rick Pildes

Professor Pildes is the Sudler Family Professor of Constitutional Law and Co-Faculty Director for the Program on Law and Security at NYU School of Law. His scholarship focuses on legal issues concerning the structure of democratic institutions and politics, separation of powers, administrative law, and national-security law. A clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall at the United States Supreme Court, Professor Pildes has been named a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, a Guggenheim Fellow, and a Carnegie Scholar. Full bio »

The Obama Speech: The Same Standards for Targeted Killings Apply to Non-Citizens as to Citizens

By
Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 2:43 PM

There are many important strands to President Obama’s national-security speech, but I want to focus on just one particularly noteworthy element. In clear terms, President Obama announced today that the same substantive standards apply to targeted killings operations against non-American … Read more »

Misconceptions Versus Essential Issues Concerning Drones

By
Thursday, May 23, 2013 at 7:16 AM

I recently posted an essay, with co-author Sam Issacharoff, on what we conceive to be the key legal, institutional, and process issues concerning the use of drones for targeted killings — and even more importantly, what the underlying forces are … Read more »

Are Drone Strikes Strategically Counterproductive in Yemen?

By
Friday, March 8, 2013 at 4:38 PM

One of this country’s most knowledgeable writers about Yemen is Greg Johnsen, author of The Last Refuge: Yemen, Al-Queda, and America’s War in Arabia. Johnsen is often read as arguing that American drone strikes in Yemen do more harm … Read more »

Confusion about “Imminence” and Targeted Killings

By
Wednesday, February 6, 2013 at 11:27 AM

The central substantive issue, legally and morally, in the administration’s Targeted Killing White Paper is how the concept of an “imminent threat” should be understood. This is where much of the debate is going to focus. Already, outrage from American … Read more »

Targeted Warfare: Individuating Enemy Responsibility

By
Thursday, August 16, 2012 at 12:29 PM

In an earlier post, here, I described an article I was working on, with my colleague Sam Issacharoff, on detention, targeted killings, and the fundamental transformation we see taking place in the practice, morality, and law concerning the legitimate … Read more »

The Fundamental Transformation in the Law, Morality and Politics of War: Individuating The Responsibility of “Enemies”

By
Tuesday, July 24, 2012 at 3:02 PM

I will soon be posting on SSRN, with my co-author Sam Issacharoff, a draft academic article that offers a broad, integrated conceptual and legal framework for understanding specific counterterrorism legal and policy issues, such as detention and targeted killings. Given … Read more »

Historical Perspective on Presidential Power

By
Wednesday, April 25, 2012 at 10:53 AM

In an essay entitled Law and the President that I’ve just published in the Harvard Law Review, I began by providing a brief historical and political perspective on shifting views of presidential power over the course of the 20th and … Read more »

How Much Does Law Constrain the President?

By
Friday, March 23, 2012 at 11:23 AM

Forthcoming next month in the Harvard Law Review is an essay of mine entitled Law and the President. The essay, here, explores the extent to which law constrains the exercise of presidential power in both domestic and foreign … Read more »

How Government Silence Undermines Terrorism Policies: Part II

By
Sunday, March 4, 2012 at 5:26 PM

Attorney General Eric Holder will apparently give a public address on Monday that will provide a fuller explanation and justification for the government’s policies on targeted killings, including for the targeted killing of an American citizen in Yemen. Other administration … Read more »

How Government Silence Undermines Terrorism Policies: Part One

By
Sunday, October 9, 2011 at 3:27 PM

I want to put discussion of whether the government should publicly disclose the full legal framework behind its targeted killings program, including the killing of Al-Aulaqi, an American citizen, in a larger and more general philosophical and political context. Across … Read more »

Warsame: An Emerging New Model for Terrorism Cases?

By
Tuesday, July 5, 2011 at 9:40 PM

As Bobby notes, the recently announced criminal prosecution of Ahmed Abdulkadir Warsame, captured overseas almost three months ago by U.S. military forces, could be an important test of an emerging hybrid model for handling alleged terrorism cases that offers an … Read more »

Do Commentators and Congress Treat All of the WPR as Law: The 60-Day Clock, Again

By
Friday, June 24, 2011 at 4:56 PM

First, my thanks to Ben, Jack, and Bobby for permitting me to become an affiliated blogger on this terrific site.

We are likely soon to get a test of how seriously Congress takes all of the War Powers Resolution (WPR). … Read more »