Skip to content

Posts by Mark Martins

Mea Culpa: The Military’s Proper Role in Strengthening the Rule of Law During Armed Conflict

By
Wednesday, September 7, 2011 at 11:03 AM

My contribution to Lawfare’s 10th Anniversary Project concerns the role of the military in strengthening justice institutions in countries struggling to emerge from instability, a topic on which my personal and professional views have changed as a result of deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan and service in U.S. national security ranks.  Ten years ago, having recently participated in successful . . .
Read more »

NATO Stands Up Rule of Law Field Support Mission in Afghanistan

By
Wednesday, July 6, 2011 at 2:07 PM

Kandahar–Among the ceremonies in Afghanistan on this past July 4th was one having more to do with Afghans and their international partners than with the United States troops stationed here, though we Americans saw strong connections between our allies’ celebration and our own Independence Day observances.  Implementing last month’s decision of the North Atlantic Treaty . . .
Read more »

Lawfare: So Are We Waging It?

By
Thursday, November 25, 2010 at 12:01 AM

Parwan, Friday, November 19, 2010 — The week’s posts up until now—written on a Blackberry while we moved or found small spaces of time between engagements—position me finally to move from the definitional and philosophical matters I pondered yesterday in Khost to Jack’s September question: Do I consider counterinsurgency (COIN) in Afghanistan to be “lawfare.” . . .
Read more »

Reflections on “Lawfare” and Related Terms

By
Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 12:01 AM

Khost, Thursday, November 18, 2010 — Having outlined, in theory as well as in practice, the military’s and ROLFF’s proper counterinsurgency (COIN) role in Afghanistan, it is time to blog more pointedly—to “drill down,” as the great 101st Airborne Division Rakkasan soldiers I am with today in Khost might say—on the term “lawfare.” Inaugurating this . . .
Read more »

Building the Rule of Law in Practice

By
Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM

Kandahar City, Wednesday, November 17, 2010 — Counterinsurgency (COIN) theory—for that is what my last post describes—is only that: theory. The current reality in Afghanistan is that the rule of law remains mostly just a worthy goal. To evaluate whether COIN operations here are, as Jack Goldsmith writes, a “weapon of war . . . that . . .
Read more »

Building the Rule of Law in Theory

By
Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:05 AM

Kandahar, Tuesday, November 16, 2010 – Whether contemporary U.S. counterinsurgency operations (COIN) and legal institution-building are “an attractive form of lawfare,” as Jack proposed in his 8 September post, is a question of both theory and practice. A good deal of theory on these matters can be found in the U.S. military’s 2006 COIN manual and . . .
Read more »

Lawfare in Afghanistan?

By
Monday, November 22, 2010 at 7:00 AM

Kabul, Monday, November 15, 2010 – Jack Goldsmith invited me more than two months ago to write in this space about our military’s involvement in efforts to build the rule of law in Afghanistan. In his initial post, Jack wondered what I thought about referring to those efforts as “lawfare.” I apologize for the lateness of . . .
Read more »