Skip to content

Posts by Gregory McNeal

Gregory McNeal is a professor at Pepperdine University. He is a national security specialist focusing on the institutions and challenges associated with global security, with substantive expertise in national security law and policy, criminal law, and international law. He previously served as Assistant Director of the Institute for Global Security, co-directed a transnational counterterrorism grant program for the U.S. Department of Justice, and served as a legal consultant to the Chief Prosecutor of the Department of Defense Office of Military Commissions on matters related to the prosecution of suspected terrorists held in the detention facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Five Ways to Reform the Targeted Killing Program

By
Tuesday, April 23, 2013 at 3:07 AM

Can the targeted killing program be reformed?  That will be the topic of discussion today at 4pm EST, as the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights holds a hearing entitled “Drone Wars: The Constitutional and Counterterrorism Implications of Targeted Killing”  Regular Lawfare readers know that I’ve authored six prior . . .
Read more »

It’s Time for a White Paper on Congressional Oversight of Targeted Killings

By
Friday, March 22, 2013 at 12:19 AM

In my prior posts I discussed the process of targeted killing, and some of the accountability mechanisms embedded in the process.  This post, and my next and final post will address reform recommendations that may help make the targeted killing program more publicly accountable. The recent news that the Obama administration is considering transferring responsibility . . .
Read more »

Presidential Politics, International Affairs and (a bit on) Pakistani Sovereignty

By
Friday, March 15, 2013 at 6:48 PM

In my prior post I focused on how Congress can serve as a mechanism of political accountability for targeted killings.  In this post I want to focus on presidential and international politics as potential accountability mechanisms. PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS If congressional oversight does not work, what about the executive branch’s response to political pressure?  For politics . . .
Read more »

The Politics of Accountability for Targeted Killings

By
Thursday, March 14, 2013 at 6:51 PM

As regular readers know, I authored three posts on the kill-list creation process.  In my first post I explained how law creates categories of targets, and how bureaucrats begin to create lists of targets.  In my second post I explained how network analysis contributes to the kill-list creation process.  The third post described the extensive . . .
Read more »

Kill-List Baseball Cards and the Targeting Paper Trail

By
Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 6:51 PM

This is a depiction of what a kill-list “baseball card” looks like:

Kill-Lists and Network Analysis

By
Monday, February 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM

In my previous post I discussed how law creates three broad categories of potential targets (AUMF targets, Covert Action targets, and Ally targets).  Those broad categories mean that many individuals may be targetable based on their status as members of an organized armed group.  Working from these broad legal categories, the U.S. next relies on . . .
Read more »

How to Make A Kill-List

By
Monday, February 25, 2013 at 7:05 AM

Thanks to Lawfare for hosting me again.  I enjoyed my last visit, when I wrote about the U.S. military’s collateral damage estimation process, and I especially appreciated the helpful feedback (and in some cases, resources) I received from military and intelligence professionals and other thoughtful commentators.  For this round of guest posts I will focus . . .
Read more »