Skip to content

Jenks on Criminal Jurisdiction as a Dealkiller for a US-Afghan SOFA

By
Sunday, November 25, 2012 at 6:29 PM

Over at OJ, Chris Jenks (SMU Law) contends that US-Afghan negotiations for a post-2014 SOFA are likely in the end to come apart over the question of Afghan criminal jurisdiction over U.S. servicemembers.  This is a critical point, and one well-worth bearing in mind anytime one encounters the claim that the United States will maintain a significant ground presence in Afghanistan beyond 2014.   Should Chris’s prediction pan out, I think the U.S. role in Afghanistan circa 2015 will look much like its current role in Yemen (some airstrikes and a lot of Foreign Internal Defense activities).    Note that such a result would seem to run with the grain of the administration’s preference for light-footprint, in-the-shadows forms of counterterrorism, not to mention enabling the President to claim the mantle of having extracted the U.S. from not just one but two overseas wars.

Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Email this to someoneTweet about this on Twitter2Print this pageShare on Reddit0

Filed under: Terrorism Trials

Tags: