Skip to content

Democrat Views of Unilateral Presidential War Power During Bush Years

By
Thursday, March 17, 2011 at 9:24 PM

In anticipation of the growing likelihood of some form of U.S. intervention in Libya, Michael Stransky of the Senate Republican Policy Committee this afternoon circulated an impish collection of Bush-era views by senior Obama administration and congressional Democratic officials “concerning the proper Congressional role in debating the use of aggressive war-like actions against the territory and forces of another sovereign country.”  Here is his list:

  • “The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.” – Barack Obama Dec. 20, 2007.
  • S.J. Res. 23, clarifying that the use of force against Iran is not authorized by the Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against Iraq, implying in practice that if the President wanted to use force against Iran he would have to seek further Congressional authorization for that action (introduced on November 1, 2007 by Senator Obama).
  • “I just want to make it clear, speaking for myself, that if the President concluded he had to invade Iran, . . . he does need congressional authority to do that.  I just want to set that marker.” – Joe Biden, Jan. 11, 2007, S. Hrng. 110-153 at p. 107.
  • S. 759, prohibiting the use of funds for military operations in Iran except pursuant to a specific authorization of Congress (introduced March 5, 2007, co-sponsored by, among others, Senators Clinton and Kerry).
  • S. Res. 356, stating that any offensive military action taken against Iran must be explicitly approved by Congress before such action is initiated (introduced Oct. 25, 2007, co-sponsored by, among others, Senators Clinton, Durbin, Byrd, Dorgan, Feinstein, Murray, Stabenow, Whitehouse)
Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Email this to someoneTweet about this on Twitter0Print this pageShare on Reddit0